I just want someone who has insight into the game and tells it like it, without any agenda or trying to get a reaction etc.

Having abit of good humoured bias is fine, carragher and neville bounce off each other fantastically in football. But it works because they speak the truth.

Briers would be an interesting choice. I expect he'd need some media training, but as a halfback he'd have that brain and would likely provide good insight into the game, by all acounts he's abit of a joker, so he could inject that humour and shouldn't hide his warrington roots.

You mean his St. Helens roots

I mean in the fact he's played at warrington for nearly all his career, so he'll have a soft spot for warrington.

I don't think having a bias is a problem, as long as it's open and the truth is still spoken (e.g carragher and neville in football), they have humour with it.

It's far worse when it's underhanded, like clarke.

Gene Ormsby's currently getting the Steve treatment.

Anyone who a) thinks that Gene Ormsby looks like Sean Connery, and b) thinks it is a good idea to share this with the nation, should not be working in television.

To be fair, I was in absolute hysterics regarding the Ormsby / Bond comparison. Very, very funny moment and even Clarkey backed up with a 'licence to thrill' comment after Ratchford's try!

Regarding the sky commentary I reckon our very own Paul Wellens would be perfect to have as an analyser / co-commentator when he retires, playing the Gary Neville role in rugby league.

Jamie Peacock says he wants to get involved in the media side of things. I think he'd be great.

Wello would send the viewers to sleep

honestly just take my word for it.

It'd be like Kieth Lemon commentating

to be fair he's pretty good when he's on the super league show