Anyone seen series two yet? Better? Worse?

Can't say I was thrilled by the selection of Colin Farrell who's been living off an undeserved reputation for the past 10-12 years. Don't mind Vince Vaughn, tho.

And if the script is as bad as what ultimately developed in the first series I won't bother.

It's interesting that the well-regarded Anglo-American critic, David Thomson, declared Red Riding to be rl"Better than The Godfather"rl

He took a ton of stick for that claim (no one can criticize Coppola in the States) but I think he's one of the very few critics (along with the late Roger Ebert) who really paid attention to the trilogy.

I'm not going to get into silly debates about whether or not RR is "better" or "worse" than TG. My position is that it is a masterpiece. Anyone who has read David Peace's books will appreciate they are not obvious candidates for cinematic treatment.

The fact that the trilogy bridged the gap between literature and film whilst retaining the essence of Peace's bleak tale is an achievement in itself. The fact that it did so using three separate directors all using different recording methods is nothing short of astonishing.

Peace is a bit of a polarizing author. But he has something different to say about a Britain we think we know and yet really don't. Given the Jimmy Savile revelations (plus others) I think he was absolutely BANG ON THE MARK in his appraisal of Britain's seedy underbelly where sexual abuse is rife and police corruption rampant.

True Detective plays at being this sober and serious only to then chicken out at the final hurdle.

Watched the first two episodes. I loved season one (even if the ending was for want of a better word, cliched) but this hasn't really grabbed me tbh. It looks nice, and the acting is solid (Vaughn in particular is playing a good part), but very little has happened with the exception of a cliff hanger twist at the end of episode 2 (won't say any more than that).

It's not terrible by any means, and it has the potential to be quite an interesting story, but had I not already been a fan I doubt I would have bothered past episode one tbh.

1st episode of season two didn't grab me but I thought ep2 moved up a gear. I also won't mention the ending of ep2 but i am looking forward now to seeing ep3 to find out what happens.

Just watched episode 3, the pace is picking up a gear or two. Vince Vaughan gave a superb performance.

Season 1 is incredible. Season 2 was pretty slow to get going but it's worth sticking with. Watched the final episode of season 2 this morning, wow!

I know I'm in the minority - but I prefer Season 2 to Season 1. Perhaps the first series hits slightly higher peaks. But the second is good from the opening episode to the last whereas the first dropped off a cliff in the final third. Thought all the actors really hit their mark - even Taylor Kitsch.

One thing which kind of bugged me with the first is McConaughey's accent. I can't help thinking he's overdoing the phoney Texan drawl.

I'm halfway through season 2 and I'm really enjoying it - it's scuzzy, dark and delightfully convoluted; I wasn't sure I could wear what seemed like an implausible coming together of three such damaged main characters, but the conceit works when you understand the bigger picture - they're together precisely *because* they're damaged. Excellent stuff, well worth the time.

The one criticism I have of Season Two is the plot. It somehow manages to be both convoluted and empty at the same time. Nothing makes any sense and it's very easy to completely forget why everyone is rushing about so eagerly.

The fact that the whole thing succeeds despite a pretty mediocre plot is testament to the actors, cinematography team and the musical score (an earthy, industrial creation which, if anything, seems more suited to Detroit or Pittsburgh than LA).

Vince Vaughn gets a lot of stick (which, admittedly, he often deserves). I don't think he's a particularly great actor. But he makes up for his shortcomings with a ton of charisma.

The minute I heard Colin Farrell had been cast my expectations were pretty low. In many ways he reminds me of Russell Crowe in that he blazed a trail during his early career but has seriously let things slip since he became established.

I recently watched him in Alexander and whilst I really enjoyed the film he was dreadfully miscast. But even wearing a ridiculous blond wig he never plumbed the depths he did wearing that terrible moustache in Michael Mann's godawful Miami Vice.

Thankfully Farrell appears to have learned some lessons (that or he's finally met a director who refuses to put up with his second-rate shtick).

Thought both Rachael McAdams and Taylor Kitsch's characters were a touch underdone. The latter especially had a hell of a lot of possibilities given his post-traumatic stress and sexual identity issues. That said, both did about as much as they could with the latitude they were granted.

Still think it's sub-par Red Riding. But even that's better than most of the trash broadcast on TV these days.