We'll see a couple of quality additions, but the main change will be a really hard off season. When you add Holroyd and Gannon (hopefully) into the mix we don't look too bad off for numbers, particularly in the back row - Bentley, McDonnell, Gannon, Littlewood and Ruan seems like plenty. If we sign a back rower as well as a prop I'd be surprised if all of them are here next year, as they won't all get many games.

We'll no doubt see some players thrive on a tougher pre season, and others not so much, but the team as a whole will be a lot more energetic and able to play to the style Arthur wants for longer.

A shame Hudson hasn't worked out. I assume he's asked for a release because he's nowhere near getting a game despite us having only two fit props. It will be interesting to see where he ends up.

Not sure if we have an injury thread. Apparently Holroyd and Handley out for reastr of season

Had heard that Hudson was given 2 weeks off recently to go on holiday and 'recharge' despite being back fully fit and ready for full training, this being during our prop injury crisis too. So his release isn't much of a surprise.

Yeah Rohan’s recruitment has left us in a pickle for a year or 2….

I honestly don't think we need a lot of changes, though. A couple of key additions plus a hard preseason will see us a completely different proposition.

Yes I posted it on the Cats at home thread.

Holroyd can't be relied up. Neither can Gannon. All for RCG and Matterson.

Those two would make a huge difference

Under BA, and with his work on the rest of the squad, we'd be transformed.

What this team needs more than anything is a serious half back that can organise the attack - Croft is OK but he is not an organiser. Neither Frawley nor Sinfield are of sufficient quality to propel the team into the top 4.

All I here on here is a clamour for more props - how many do you need? Given the backs seem to do all the yard making what are they actually bringing to the party?

In answer to your question, a minimum of six of a good standard. We currently have four (I'm very generously including Sangare in that) and are also getting rid of Donaldson and Hudson from this years squad. For context Wigan are in double figures. Our backs do so much yardage work in the absence of forwards who can. We'll get a chance to revisit half back at the end of 25 when Frawley is OOC.

Of the genuine Props we have, I'd say only Oledski is of the right quality. Holroyd is injured too frequently missing lots of games, Lisone is good for 15 minute spells but isn't fit, Sangare is less fit than Lisone and I'd question his application and attitude, then we are into players who are not genuine props.

I'd happily replace Sangare and Lisone, and Holroyd needs to prove he can get (and stay) on the field.

We need at least 2 props before any of the above leave, and some should be leaving if we are serious about winning things.

Half backs need the platform to perform. We are woefully short in the forwards, that needs addressing first and foremost.

You ask how many props do we need, well at one point and for quite a long time on Saturday we didn't have any on the pitch, I'd say we need more than that.

A new half wont be on the agenda for for 2025.The halfs will be better if the pack sets a platform.

Absolutely right Chris, without more grunt in the front row, that can dominate the opposition and win collisions, we could have Wally Lewis and Peter Sterling at halfback and still lose most games. Conversely, get the front row right and Frawley in particular will look better than he has at any point this season. He might not be the answer to our halfback conundrum, but we're not giving him much of a chance right now either.