I think the scoreline flattered us somewhat. Sounded dreadful.

had a 50/50 forward pass not gone against us in the last 2 mins it would have been 4 trys in about 6 mins and a final score of 32-28 which us even more frustrating.

We were tripe but yet had we started playing 5 mins earlier we would have snatched this game at the death, a bit like Wakey away the other year where we scored 3 trys in last 8 mins to win it in last minute with the Scotty D try in the corner

Burrow was IMO the main instigator of the 'fight back' Surely he has to start next week and put Mags back on bench?

Next week is going to be embarrassing for RL

This thread is embarrassing

Or the weird notion of playing McGuire at 6, Burrow at 7 and Sinfield at 13.

McDermott thinks "Hey that might just work"
But no I'll stick with mine and Jimmy's game plan. The "headless chicken" plan might work one day.

Indeed. Not a huge fan of Burrow, but he was easily Leeds best player which says it all about how good Sinfield, McGuire and Buderus were. Burrow at hooker has been proven ineffective & exploitable against competent teams, however, so the genius of idea of PLAYING EVERYONE IN THEIR PROPER POSITIONS might yet come to pass.

Also, Hauraki was our most dangerous forward, which again tells a story.

Guess how many games Quins had won in the previous nineteen - one against Wakefield.That says it all.
Contrast our performance against Wigan's last night.Professional performance against an amateur one.

Very well done McDermott. What a ******* genius you are.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

Shocking decision (with hindsight) to rest some key players.

How many times in the super league era has the team winning the cc final lost the week before?

I only remember saints in 2001, when they lost to warrington the week before.

how many good games have we had?