That's pretty much how I see it too.

That's not to excuse Hardaker & Minchella but as you say it's not a straight forward case.

aye, if it were a straight forward case of a 2 v 1 assault the CPS would love to hang two local celebs by the nearest lamp post. somethings not being said.

main this is Leeds have stated that both players are available for selection.

Anyone else think that perhaps as this happened before Hardaker moved in with his team mates and the club apparently knew about it for several weeks, that maybe they've encouraged the move for the next five months to try and keep him put of trouble and help him grow up a bit?

Just a theory but makes sense.

As I see it. They've ended up in some student accommodation with some of the students from there. It's in the early hours and one student who has probably got to be up early for an exam or to hug a tree has come out complaining about noise, they've argued, couple of punches thrown, end of.

More a fight, all be it a one sided one as you would expect with a RL player vs a tax dodger. Assualt and attack are exaggerated terms, hardly like he's ended up with broken ribs, broken leg, internal injuries......just some black eyes and a bit of brushing on his neck, probably took two punches at most. Probably just thought it was a golden chance for a bit of compo (why he went to the club first apparently) to pay some of his uni fees or buy some weed with. The players and club, happy to oblige so it can be sorted and moved on with quickly and easily.

Sounds likely....... You sure you weren't involved printer with that much detail ahaha

IMO They have had a lucky break. Hopefully they will both move on with a more mature and professional attitude. I hope that behind the scenes, the riot act has been well and truly read to both.

Are we convinced this all has a 'happy ending though"

Because the Police have removed the threat of criminal action I assume that the employer has to make them available for selection?

However the club are still doing their internal investigation and given he's admitted to an assault, however minor/trivial, IF Zak was on a final written warning for disciplinary reasons (and I don't know if he was) then surely this could well lead to his dismissal?

Well the part about being out until 3am. IF the team had training just several hours later that morning (they should probably be able to recall that being the opening week of the season) I reckon that would p*ss off the management more.

They don't have to make him available, they could say they're dropping him for two weeks with two weeks suspension etc.

Think a financial slap on the wrists by the club to both guys and that'll be the book closed on it.

that is one of the largest ifs i have ever read. why not make up more stuff you have absolutely no clue about? i will help you, we could call it Zakanory

People should not assume that the incident was trivial because of the "punishment". If the general public knew just how far people could go and avoid a custodial sentence or even a trial they would be appalled. Criminal justice system is creaking and the prisons are bursting at the seams.

Hardaker is a great talent but he's simply never going to learn. Gareth Hock was a great talent.

If I were Leeds I'd cash in as soon as I was confident that Goulding was ready.

That's unfair, you're comparing a talented but slightly flawed young man with a complete and utter ar*ehole.

It's Golding not Goulding. Unless Bobby is making a comeback.

Love this post!

wonder if the students in question still have a student loan or if it's. amazingly, been paid off?