Isnt there a thread for this elsewhere?! Anyway,how many times have we seen this type of performance in the regular rounds the last few seasons?am i worried?no.will we lose a few more in this manner?yes.will we turn up when it matters?almost certainly yes.

This is just the leeds way under mcdermott.nobody in the headingley hierachy will be bothered in the slightest and we will move on to the next game.

I'm pretty sure they'll be bothered. They've made it very clear they want to improve on regular season performances, and that won't go down well. While we shouldn't be calling for the coaches head, we shouldn't just accept performances like that, just because we think it'll be all right in the end.

Could be a strange season , saints looked a different side and really put the wire away quite convincingly .
Next weeks Wigan match looks to be very interesting ,which rhinos side will turn up the one with the aggressive defence as per the hull and the saints match. Or tonight's below par performance . Anyway plenty of work for our coaching staff to do.

At the end of the day the paying spectators are entitled to a performance of a certain standard - today fell well below what should be expected

A bit early to be calling for his head but that was absolutely awful tonight.

Aye, there were literally twenty things I would have rather have been doing 5 mins into the 2nd half when it was clear our completion rate wasn't going to improve.

The players were amateurs tonight and that is disrespectful to amateurs.

Whilst we played very poor tonight, I think the most pressing question tonight is.......'How much drugs/alcohol have you taken/consumed?'

P.S. And looking at the Souths teamsheet, Luke Burgess never even played for them this week.

I don't get this 'playing to a certain standard to validate entrance fees'.......the players SHOULD play well, but because their looking to win the match.............not to make your £20 feel well spent.

At the end of the day despite what they say, paying spectators AREN'T 'entitled' to a certain performance.......it would be nice if they got one, but they aren't 'entitled' to one.

Yes they are - they are paying to watch elite sport - they should be entitled to see elite players being able to do the basics at least i.e. catch a ball and tackle. This is entertainment nothing more, if you went to a concert and the singer couldn't remember the words or the guitarist the cords you would be asking for your money back. As spectator you are not entitled to a win or flash rugby but you are entitled to the basics at least.

Utter tripe from the OP.

I may have become more relaxed after night sleep after last night performance. But I stick to the basic point of what I was saying. Leeds were not good enough last night, over the last two years there have been far to many performances like this. Yes we have won the GF for the last two years, that has happened because a group of players have been able to win four games in the row. The side is getting very old and needs radical surgery. I do not believe Mcdermott has the ability to do this.

I think any singer would struggle to hit the right note with 3 eighteen stone fellas dragging him to the floor or trying to take his head of . Don't think that's the best analogy to use. Any sport that is played at such a speed with such ferocity cannot guarantee that "basics" will always be achieved. I would say the basic thing we got wrong was the tactics. With Thaler playing such a "skinny" 10 metres and defences up so quickly, it was crying out for decent kicks through or over advancing defences. Huddersfield utilised such tactics and executed them well. The flat, crash ball against a stifling defence in poor conditions led to countless mistakes and little pressure or territory. Anderson 1, Mcdermott 0.

Worst performance I've seen Leeds produce since Huddersfield away last year.

Just look at it as the 2nd free game out of the 3 you received