I'm not sure they would. I can't see Billy Slater giving up a kangaroos jersey to play for Salford, even for £1m. Even then, the salary cap would not allow it. If it were so easy, why wouldn't other clubs have done it by now. Warrington are the closest, but they were a regular top 6 side before hey had loads of cash

Well yes that is the point. The SC wont let them do it.

Billy Slater might not want to come over, he might, i dont know but the SC stops Salford even asking that quesiton in a realistic way.

I have no doubt that every RL player has their price.

Mick the development officer without a doubt.

The apethetic Manchester public will probably have little or no idea who Billy Slater is. However, get the kids interested in the sport itself, get the parents interested via them and that interest will grow. I have friends who have started attending games every now and again (inlcuding internationals) because their kids started playing junior rugby and because they went via their club. They wouldn't have known who Billy Slater was before their kid started playing and they probably still don't. But they've been to Headingley....and Wembley to watch Rugby league.

I agree to an extent. However, Bullmania did come before the Bulls real successes so it can be done.

The foundations for the success have been the juniors. None of the players you have listed have played in all six of the Grand Final wins. Can you guess which players have done? I'll give you a clue, none of them are Aussies. These Grand final wins were built from the late 1990s early 2000s when the current crop of junuiors all came through. None of the overseas players you mentioned were at the club when the foudnations were laid.

It's also not guarantee that signing Slater will alter Salford's fortunes in any way. What pack will he play behind? Remember, Wally lewis once played for Wakefield and they won nowt, Allan Langer once played for Warrington and they won nowt.

The salary cap is an integral part of the game (and many other, more wealthier games). I see no reason to tinker with it to pander to an impatient wealthy man who has no real understanding of or background in the game.

I don’t know, i remember my first times playing RL were in the park with mates or in the playground at break-time playing touch and pass pretending to be whoever had been the best that weekend. I went on to play for youth sides because of that, im not sure I would have joined a youth RL side if I didn’t know what RL or who played it. Im not saying community development can be ignored at all. Im just saying that the glitz and glamour of the big names makes it a heck of a lot easy to get kids in to it.
But bullmania only peaked when the Bulls were successful. They go hand in hand. One makes the other a lot easier. It is a hell of a lot easier to market a good product well, than to present a sows ear as a silk purse.


Yet all of them had an integral part to play in that success.

Yes leeds put the foundations in place for a successful youth development system, and yes we spent about 5 years building towards the 2004 season. But during that time we didn’t just make do and mend we were paying £350k for Iestyn Harris, making big noises about million pound contracts for Jonah Lomu, bringing in big names like Powell, Clyde, Mullins, Lee Jackson, Barnhill, Mackay, Walker, Vowles.

And there are fans of Wakefield, who are fans of Wakefield even now, because of Wally Lewis, people who heard the noises about the crappy little RL club down the road signing a superstar and challenging the big boys.

That’s the message a superstar gives, that this crappy little Salford, the Salford of relegation and second tier RL, the Salford who haven’t won anything since moses was a lad, the Salford whose best young players left as soon as they could, the Salford of The Willows, the Salford who got beat every week don’t exist anymore. This is new Salford, the ones who are mixing it with the big boys, the ones who are trying to not only challenge but win, the ones where 2nd best isn’t good enough any more, a Salford to be proud of and that is one of Salfords biggest barriers right now.

No amount of careful planning and youth development (as massively important as it is) sends that message. Sadly Mick the development officer isn’t sexy, he doesn’t capture the imagination, he doesn’t get the people going.

The Salary cap isn’t right. I know it isn’t right. It cant be right. The SC hasn’t changed value for over 10 years. In real terms it has gone down by about %30 over that time. So either it was 30% too high 10 years ago, or it is wrong now. If it doesn’t change next year its real terms value will go down again which means it is either too high this year or too low next.

Yes, we need some sort of talent distribution system, yes we need something to stop someone buying up all the talent, and yes we need to try and restrict wage inflation. I don’t get why this structure is always the best structure for that and this figure is always the best figure for diverse businesses in an ever-changing game in an ever-changing environment.

You already knew RL, clearly. If you don't know it how do you know you wanted to emulate?

If the people of Machester are ignorant of it, get the kids in the schools playing it and get them tickets to watch it. I just don't see how Billy Slater means diddly squat to a guy in Burnage who knows nowt about Rugby league. I do see a scenario where his kids comes home from school full of excitement because they played it that day and he has two free tickets for this weekend's game so Dad is nagged into going. Salford don't necessarily have to be the greatest team in history to keep their interest. I was taken as a child in the 70s when Leeds were good but I really showed little interest. I really started taking notice in the early to mid 80s when they were garbage. I've been going ever since.

How many amateur clubs are there in Machester compared to, say, Leeds or Wakefield? We have to build that up (or should I say Koukash has to)

They certainly do go hand in hand but there's no doubt that Bullmania came first and the Bulls were the pioneers of Super League and transformed themselves. It started before the success.

Integral? Not sure about that. Webb played in 3 of 6. Buderus 1 of 6 Mckenna and Bai 1 of 6. You might be able to argue Ali was integral and you can certainly argue Peacock has been integral but none of the others. It's inarguable that McGuire, Burrow, Sinfield and other juniors have been integral.

All of whom served a purpose, none of whom played a part in a championship. By the way, Lomu is an interesting name to throw up. At the time we were throwing money to tempt him we were heading full steam ahead to liquidation and nowhere near winning a championship. Hardly an argument for Koukash to follow suit.

That's rhetoric and I don't believe there is a single fan that goes to Bell Vue now BECAUSE Wally lewis played for them in the 1980s. Some may recall it nostalgically. Most old timers though will probably harp back to an earlier era when Wakefield won trophies with local lads like Don Fox.

It's an attempt to deliver that message via a quick fix but history shows that more often than not, it usually fails. How many trophies have Wakefield won since they attempted to lay the foundations by signing Wally Lewis, how much has their fan base increased and how many times have they been insolvent since?

He does. He gets the kids going. That is the key part. Mick going to their school every week and getting them to play means more to them than the overpaid Aussie they probably haven't heard of who has made not a jot of difference to the fortunes of the team they don't yet care about.

It isn't right as a principle or it isn't right in value. You can argue the latter I suppose but i'd suggest we simply have to be realistic and cut our cloth. IMO, you cannot under any circumstances argue the former coherently. If the Aussies have one, heck, if the NFL has one than Rugby League is not above one.

The biggest sport in the world, soccer doesn't have a cap in any major league anywhere in the world - so that does suggest there are options/alternatives.

The question is how do you get more youngsters playing the game? would more kids want to get involved if Billy Slater was visiting the school every week or if the youth development guy from the Rhinos pitches up?

If the salary cap in a sport is losing pace with inflation it would suggest all is not well. If the cost of attendance is rising faster than the monies paid to those you are paying to watch it begs the question where is the money going? It also suggests - logically - the value of the entertainment on offer must also be decreasing?

The man makes a very valid comment re the relative cost of the Leeds side compared to the Melbourne side - something Herr Lucas sidesteps/ignores in his comparisons. No one side in SL could afford Smith, Slater and Cronk in their team. If we want to be a world class sport we have to be to attract world class talent.

We are a long way away from the biggest sport in the world. I doubt we should be attempting to emulate "scooer" if for no other reason that the vast majority of soccer clubs are insolvent anyway.

Yes, more youngsters playing the game is the key. Development officers acheive that.

All is not well. Things are tough. I'd love our players to earn what soccer players do, or what Australian players do. But we're not soccer, we're not the NRL and we do not have their money.

Soccer maybe insolvent but that doesn't stop people wanting to get involved - look at Arsenal and the bids to buy it.

Gareth, I appreciate your point but is buttoning down the hatches the way to expand the game or do you sometimes need to speculate to accumulate?

Leeds are in a lucky position whereby player's wages are effectively falling compared to income, a situation the CEO would like to see continue - GH has stated he would like an even lower cap.

At the moment we have a sport that is spiralling downwards in - as you said a very tough economic position. To continue as we are will only lead to one thing a lesser product for both TV and paying spectators - something needs to change.

To go back to Arsenal it shows what happens when you are not prepared to invest in the best - Van Persie, Fabregas - you become an also ran - is that what we want for SL?

But that’s where I knew games from, from the stars. I remember being in absolute awe of Garry Schofield being a friends birthday party when I was about 7, I don’t think I had ever even watched a game at that point, it was something my dad watched and my Grandad used to play.

Im working with a guy from Kirkcaldy at the moment, massive football fan, didn’t really know much about RL at all, but he did know who Billy Slater was, and he did know who the Melbourne Storm were, and he took his family to watch the WCC which was every single ones first match.

He does. But that doesn’t discount him doing other things too.

What im sure he will find when trying to expand in to Manchester is just getting peoples attention

Im not sure thats true Bradford were contesting for titles and winning them at the end of the winter era and beginning of the Summer era.

I think Ali was as important as anyone in our success over the last few years. JP is a cornerstone. Webb too, i think unfortunately his last few months being so bad, and Hardaker coming in and doing such a great job will make people forget how good he is.

But we have been extremely lucky to find Mcguire, Burrow and Sinfield, these are special players, there is no more guarantee that even if Salford do everything we did, and follow the masterplan to perfection that they will find a Mcguire Burrow or Sinfield. Is Dr Koukash supposed to just accept a mediocre at best side until he does find them? What if through no fault of their own Salford don’t find a Sinfield, Burrow or Mcguire for 10 years?

Some played in the 98 grand final, some in the 99 challenge cup win and yes they served a purpose for us. As they would for Salford.

I don’t think it is improbable that there are Wakefield fans who first became Wakefield fans because of Wally Lewis. Im not saying employing Wally Lewis gave Wakefield a free pass forever, im saying that it attracted people at first, and those individuals support grew from there.

Wakefield were a basket case long after Wally Lewis left. Look at Warrington as a better example, Joey Johns famously paid for himself in additional sales. Signing big stars like Matt King, Monaghan (both) Morley,
They will hear of them. Very quickly. Kids aren’t dumb, they want to support the biggest teams with the best players

I would argue both. I think the SC in principle, morally is wrong. Every man should be able to sell his labour and skills to the highest bidder, I am fundamentally uncomfortable with a situation where the owners of companys get together and organise a structure whereby they work together to keep wages down. I also think on principle our players are vastly underpaid. However I understand it as a ‘necessary evil’ at the moment which the players have accepted.

My biggest problem with this SC is that it doesn’t cut our cloth accordingly. It is a completely arbitrary number. It has no relation to what the clubs could afford or would be willing to pay. Leeds are turning over £13m, Wakefield about £4m. It cannot be realistic that both Leeds and Wakefield are cutting their cloth accordingly.

Even under your terms where star players visit all the area's schools every week, the signing of big names is a zero-sum game.

Iestyn Harris was mentioned earlier, and, yes, Leeds signing him may have had an effect both on the pitch and in enthusing juniors, and even in attracting another Oldham-born prospect to the club. But it would follow that it had the opposite effect on the Warrington. That's fine for Leeds, but very much neutral for RL in general.

Investing intelligently in development, on the other hand, is no a zero-sum game in that it creates new resources. You could say that, in a limited way, the signing of Billy Slater would do this too, but no Origin-level player is coming to SL regardless of salary cap so it's a pointless argument.

Some good points here.
Just to add Sal does the game have enough money for this "exspansion"?
I'd argue not and whilst the SC remains achievable for clubs like Wakey why widen the gap or give Salford a better advantage than Wakey when they've done their rebuild without as much ££££ as the Salford owner has?
I personally wait with interest at what Barwick brings to the game after his interview last week.
Fwiw i mostly agree with G on this and id also add maybe Mr K would be better served sorting his clubs structure out asap rather than publicity stunts.

Where did speak about expansion? if you mean increased participation as expansion how can the game not afford it? I would agree at Salford he needs to increase revenues - having a better team will help that, to start now and put a structure in place to deliver that - as Leeds found - takes years. Perhaps a dual process as Leeds did with youth development being underpinned by a suitable quality team e.g. Graham Murray and Iestyn Harris, Brad Godden, Richie Blackmore etc.

Offering poorer quality entertainment at higher prices will only lead to one thing - reduced revenues.

Gates across the opening 5 rounds of SL (when compared to the opening 5 rounds in 2012) are down from an aggregate of 313,653 to 289,280.

That averages at 9,505 over 33 games in 2012 compared to 8,508 over 34 games in 2013 - a drop of just over 10%

That is a worry if we say the average price is £10 if you include kids that is £200k lost to the game in 5 weeks in a year we need to be building interest unless we want a repeat of the WC fiasco of 2000.

Why is there only 33 games in 2012? Which two games have been taken out?