Ha, not guilty! and wouldnt be putting myself forward. There are some scholarship coaches that have come through the amateur game and theyre good people, both the two main 19s academy coaches (morley included) haven't come through that pathway.

Im not coaching at the minute and have taken a break from it since the end of last season, its been nice to get out and see the 18s and 19s lads at their clubs this year as a spectator. I would like to return some day and do miss it, though at what level im not sure yet.

Wasn't a criticism last year that we didn't have a proven player coaching our juniors or in the senior squad setup and how could they take Plume seriously with his lack of top flight experience. We now have one of the few English players to be successful in the NRL, GF winner both leagues, loads of England caps......

Not sure if im understanding what gotcha means about the issues goin forward so sorry if this isnt relevent but what id like to see is for example the current 16s coach i dont know how long he's held that position but if its at least the last 2 year then he's done a great job,we'v barley lost a game,id like to see him promoted to the 19s and given a chance at that level and if he does well there who knows,a team like hunlet or york might give him a chance,then a well thought of community coach givin the 16s,like i said earlier i dont know anything about the local game or coaches in yorkshire but maybe somone like the siddal 16s coach,id imagine he's well respected? This is obviously provided coaches want the jobs.
I just like the idea of coaches bein rewarded for being good coaches and given pathways into the pro game,it would benefit them and would benefit the club imo

We did exactly what you are suggesting with Plume. He was the successfull under 16's coach for a couple of years, was moved to under 19's to work with them. Then the problem that I highlighted, he moved away from what he was a success for, and took a different line, and it failed, then moving him up to first team.

The under 16's now is made up of coaches successfull in the junior game, there is a few of them, headed up by Mark Butterill and Steve Fox who are excellent coaches. I know Steve, and I doubt he would change the way he works if moved up.

The pathway you talk about isn't always possible, not because the route isn't there, but because most of these coaches have careers outside the game to support thier family's, and giving that up is not an easy decision.

Yeah like i said its dependant on the coaches wanting the jobs. Why did plume take a differant line to what was working for him and why would fox need to change the way he works if moved up? Is it something the club insist on that the coaches have to work a certain way?

Plume was a success at the younger age group due to the way he works and respect from players. At under 19 he was a middle man following instructions, that lost that respect. I did say Fox is not the type of coach to change his ways. To be fair to Hetherington though, he made changes, Morley was a change, and it may not work but he tried it, and I understand there is more changes to come. The under 16 set up this year is different to what the previous years were, and I suspect the under 19's will probably follow suit.

Its probably not important who the 19s coach is then,if theyr expected to follow somone elses instructions it dosnt matter if theyr a good coach or not

I did say to be fair to Hetherington, he has changed, and is changing things.

Thats good to know but shouldnt of got to that stage to start with....It takes me back to my original point tho,the approach of promoting from within cant be judged on how well plume did or didnt do when by the sound of it he wasnt given a fair chance,now that the 19's coach wont have to take instruction on how to work like plume had to i think it would be a good idea to revist that approach in future,reward good coaches for being good coaches(if they want it)

Don't think you need to worry about Butterill according to his dad he's Warrington bound for next year working fulltime with their 16s and 19s(A fulltime gig is something he's been chasing for a while and doesn't feel he will get an opportunity at Leeds as they go down the ex player route) . I agree with others though that in such a short space of time he's done a great job with the 16s. The numbers moving up are testimony to that . Guess we either get in an ex player or as discussed go into the community game for a replacement.

I wonder where that leaves Peter Williams at Warrington?