I'm not saying I'd rather have Hock, just that in terms of pure talent he's the superior player.

Not condoning what Ferres did but we are talking about one issue here with him that would be massively unlikely to ever be repeated whereas Hock has a long list of 'incidents' and you always feel like his next cock up isn't too far away.

Again not condoning or trying to excuse what Ferres did but comparing him and Hock is quite flawed.

I was responding to an argument of 'the only thing that matters is playing ability'. I think Hock is the perfect example of why that isn't so.

Hardly. If you are willing to excuse poor fitness levels, awful discipline, poor attitude, lack of concentration and chronic inconsistency (while actually playing rugby) then yes, he's brilliant. Kevin Sinfield can't have been fit to lace his boots.

All his problems are my entire point. However when it comes to PLAYING ABILITY he has more than Brett Ferres.

I was responding to a very specific and (IMO) poorly thought out point, how is this so difficult to understand? I don't want Hock. I don't want Ferres. I don't agree that playing ability is all that matters. I think Hock has more ability than Ferres. I think Ferres has made a much better account of himself with his more limited skill set. I think they're both scumbags.

You're not difficult to understand at all. I just fundamentally disagree with your assessment of Hock's level of "ability".
I also understood, pretty much straight away, that you have some really deep issues with whatever you think has gone on in Ferres's private life. As I don't know the guy at all, or Huby, or Mrs Huby, or any of the details surrounding what's gone on between them I don't really have an opinion.

Hock has the same disease as Luther Burrell and Steffon Armitage caught over the summer, where they go from good to world class by not being on the field.

Hock's legacy will always be that of unfulfilled potential, and the more unfulfilled that potential has been, the bigger that potential has become. Hock went from a hard running, dynamic second rower with hit and miss defence, poor decision making who gave away far too many stupid penalties, to the new Gorden Tallis because he barely played. In 9 years at Wigan he missed nearly 2 years through injury, 2 years from a drugs ban, made 1 dream team has only 9 international caps, and was bumming about at the lower reaches of SL before his 30's and out of SL before he is 32.

Big Jim you're getting hysterical again. Hock was a drug user, he was/is unfit, he's had more red cards / suspensions than we've had hot dinners. The list is endless.

Ferres finished within a whisker of top spot, and was outstanding for England against the Kiwis. He's not broken the law or brought shame on RL. Hardly letting the team down eh? He nobbled Huby's wife. The issue is between him and Huby. Nobody else. If i was in the Rhinos team, I'd be nagging GH to sign him. Class player.

Unless you were a second rower....


















....or had a REALLY fit missus

I'm not sure why people are having digs at Big Jim over his views - IMO they're perfectly legit, just different from others. I'd be very surprised if a few RL players didn't feel exactly the same way. That's why I'd talk to the senior players about signing him before any move was made - some might feel that they couldn't play with him because of what he's done.

I for one was a bit concerned with Falloon signing, although the one-year contract helps there as he's effectively on probation. Hopefully it was more of a poor club culture at the Titans than anything else.

FWIW several NRL clubs have a "no d*ckhead" policy, which I can fully understand and would rule them out of a bid for someone who's done what Ferres has.

Wasn't aware I was doing any "frothing" or even taking sides in the argument.

falloon was accused of cocaine dealing and was cleared end of story or he wouldnt of got work visa

with regard to off field matters, some don't necessarily have an impact on on-field ability (I won't say performance) and Ferres falls into this category. Others can (such as a ban from the game for 2 years) and Hock falls into this category.

Nobody minded when Keith Senior used to put it about and get in the papers

No personal digs from me. Just don't agree with a couple of the things he's said in this thread. Nothing personal, and he's entitled to his opinion.