Anyone got a mr pepperami fancydress outfit and a saints shirt i can borrow ?

don't agree with you. everything pryce did was on the back of great work by roby. buderus got leeds on a roll and kept us going forward at pace and directed us around the park

Gotcha going for rectal reconstructive surgery after his guts fell out at the sound of the final hooter ..

awww . poor delicate little darling xxxx

Re-read the post i quoted.
"Rubbish.There wasn't a player on the pitch that came even close to pryce.Had he not gone off,we lost simple as that."
Your words not mine and that looks more like a statement of fact rather than an opinion.
I won't get into any daft tit tat posts with yer but it comes across like i described it imo.
I've seen enough to form the opinion that Roby was more influential than Pryce and Buderus had a great game for us.

Agree Johnny I thought Ablett troubled Saints all night.

I would agree with that up until Pryce went off you were definitely running us ragged.

I thought Pryce wasn't that special. In fact, watching the game back the Sky commentary team mention his lack of involvement.

How the idiot Saints fan and idiot Gotcha can say we would have definitely lost if Pryce is on the field is beyond me. Actually, with Gotcha it isn't, he's an idiot.

I mean, it's since he left Bradford how many times have we been tortured at the hands of Pryce? Were either of these two idiots at any of the last three Grand Finals? Personally, I think the Leeds players can more than handle Pryce.

Dare I ask what you were doing on a site that has members with such usernames ?

Phil Clarke did but the sensible, intelligent Irish guy spoke words of wisdom. Pryce has a laid back style. Anyone who watches his involvement in a game with even a smidgen of knowledge about the game, knows that he is always involved. He has been excellent this season and since Kyle was injured he has been outstanding. He is always organising, he works hard defensively and he chimes in for attack as and when the opportunity arises as well as creating opportunities, for himself and for other players.


Because we were giving you all kinds of trouble and he was instrumental in it, as he has been so often this season (with other teams I mean). Without him, who has been our key organiser and play maker this season, we were always going to struggle. Eastmond's loss we have adapted to and even performed our best so far this season at Wigan when he wasn't around. But without Pryce it was unlikely we would be able to create plays and maintain the momentum.

Saints have played you too often for Saints fans not to realise when you are not playing well and when we have the upper hand. Even with our missed opportunities and wrong options, of which there were quite a few, we had you nailed in that match. That you only beat us by four points when we were hit so hard I think says it all. Last season you would have tonked us in the same situation and I am amazed if you cannot see the difference in your own team.

Anyway, that is why this idiot says that with Pryce on the field we would have won.

Am I right in thinking when Buderus left the field we were 16-6 and when he returned we were 22-16 behind and went on to win the game?
Coincidence?

I must re-watch the videos of those last three Grand Finals.

You seem to think that because you had a 20 min purple patch it's enough to guarantee a win against the champions. You choose to ignore our 30 min purple patch in the 1st half.

Anyway, hypothesize all you want. Might have and could have don't win matches and they didn't win for you yesterday.