Bit rich from someone whose Twitter account is spent telling everybody which comedians/shows are/aren't entertaining whilst filling it with god awful jokes of his own in the mistaken believe you're funny.

13 days to think up a reply and thats what you came up with?

I think we can guess which side of the are/arent entertaining line the 'Chief Guardian of Acceptable Opinions and Cheerleader for the game in General' falls

Didn't see his post at the time but noticed it just now when looking at opinions about McGuire's captaincy given today's news.

What's really noticeable is that it took just over 20 minutes for you to jump on something I posted (not for the first time). You really do have an agenda/vendetta against me because I not only easily dismantled your "Super 8's are rubbish" thread on the VT but because your tiny mind couldn't cope with having an adult debate about a sensitive subject about affirmative action. Your knickers have been in a twist ever since.

I'll gladly have a debate with you when you have finally shown you can have a debate without wetting the bed in faux outrage......I suspect I'll be waiting a very long time though.

Frankly I'm flattered and ever so slightly aroused by your interest, but I'm afraid I'm spoken for.

See....that's more of that sh*t humour that you rate funny but really isn't.

But that was still the best you could come up with?

Im not sure you are coming off as the 'champion of the internet' you think you are If you are keeping lists of threads and stalking people on social media. It comes off a little try-hard. Like this isnt a bit of intellectual jousting and people really have gotten under your skin and embarrassed you.

Try a bit of whimsy, a bit of fun, your a bell3nd on a message board. You arent a member of the Swiss Guard, you just look as silly.

Who made you the humour guru?

No one, but how is it different to Gilder criticising people and banging on about "opinion police" on here yet telling people which comedians are funny or not on his Twitter whilst telling mulitiple sh*t jokes of his own?

Answer is it isn't so he shouldn't be banging on about opinions and being shot down as if he's any different or his sh*t smells like roses.

I trust GH and BM to do what's best for this team and club. All of the concerns raised by people on here won't have escaped those 2 and I'm sure they've spoken to Mags. He'll bring a different kind of leadership but that's not to say it's any way less effective than Kev's. And I'd be worried if we reliant on Mags being the only leader in the pitch. Granted we've lost 2 of the best leaders ever seen in our sport, but now there's an opportunity for others to step up. I can't wait for this season, I'm confident we'll win something and be in the mix and I'd love to see Mags lift some silverware. But if we have a bad year, my life will go on. It won't affect me half as much as the players and staff.

Just because I disagree with you acting in the capacity of Humour Guru, doesn't mean I agree with AG's comments about "opinion police", I don't.

I don't do ter, so can't comment on his input on that medium, but the thought occurs that if you find his input on there irritating, don't view it .

I just wish there was more rugby and good natured banter / humour on here and less censorious bitching, infighting and point scoring. I'm not singling you out as a chief culprit BTW, just clarifying my position.

Spot on D4mo . Danny will grow into the role and didn't do too bad a job covering Kev last year.

Someone called Tony the Tiger or something tried to bitchslap me shortly after I joined. Then tvoc decided to have a go over nothing. They don't post so much any more.

Then Gotcha and I really got into it for a while.

Whatever. It's only an internet forum. Not real life, or anything.

im not taking sides and I don't get involved in these arguments and I skip reading them when I see them develop .Mostly they are knowlegable in there own way and can have their opinions and accept others have theirs.Over here they are calle Monday morning Quarterbacks