he made all three half backs inc the captain look like chumps

If Vickery had a pedigree of sorts he might be given the benefit of the doubt. He has never played top level rugby before and looks so out of his depth it's terrifying.

Southampton F.C. Once embarrassed themselves by giving10 minutes to a bloke they were told was George Weah's cousin. Vickery, I'm afraid looks to be a similar error.

We wouldn't have stood a chance if Sir captain fantastic Kev had been on the field...



..oh hang on

It's no wonder the Aussies said 'Kev who?'

Shame its just one game...try putting a run together in the cup or playoff sometime

Aye, must have missed all those GF's, CC's and WCC's that Brough has lead Hudds to..........oh hang on

F**k it, he ripped Leeds apart in one weekly game.......he must be the best halfback EVER!!!..........

If Leeds lose a game it MUST mean they don't care.......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..........boring.........

We usually do put a run together in the cup, probably better than Leeds over the last 10 years or so without looking.

2003 = Leeds - RU.....Hudds - 4th
2004 = Leeds - 4th.....Hudds - SF
2005 = Leeds - RU......Hudds - 4th
2006 = Leeds - SF......Hudds - RU
2007 = Leeds - 5th.....Hudds - QF
2008 = Leeds - SF......Hudds - 5th
2009 = Leeds - 4th.....Hudds - RU
2010 = Leeds - RU.....Hudds - 5th
2011 = Leeds - RU.....Hudds - QF
2012 = Leeds - RU.....Hudds - SF

Leeds = 27 wins 10 losses............Average QF/SF
Hudds = 20 wins 10 losses...........Average 5th/QF

So probably not

No but it does show that you have a habit of saying things which are wrong. As illustrated by the Brough boots comment.

I'd expect better than that from you ponner tbh.
Maybe when Brough has put together enough "big game" winning performances as "Sir Kev" he might be worth as much as one of Sinfields laces until then i'd just enjoy yer traditional pretending to be contenders.

It's the Leeds team that get him to the big games. He goes missing for England, went missing against Melbourne and was miles off MOM in last years Grand Final when Ablett was the best player on the pitch by far. It's like saying Vickery has more big game experience than Brough cos he's played in a World Club Challenge but come on admit it Vickery isn't a SL player by any stretch of the imagination.

If you seriously believe any of that about Sinfield yer watching a completely different team and player.
Ablett had a fine game in the GF but watch the game closely everything we did right Sinfield had a hand in at some point and set the tone for our win.
He's done it time and time again for us in GF's and other big games.
Your lad was top quality last night and might even do it for another 10/15 games but we all know come the play-offs etc he'll be out-played and once again seen to be skulking off stamping his feet as it ends another year of so near yet so far!
In terms of England i'd say 90% of the team have "gone missing" when we've played the best but this year he's leading the team and getting asked to do exactly what he does for us so we'll see how we go.
Also this "big game" statement how has Brough lead you to wins in when he's been the top man above all others??
In Sinfields case I've lost count even now after all he's achieved many cant accept he's that good imo that just proves they aren't watching properly and cant ditch those anti Blue+Amber specs.
As for Vickery many wrote him off a couple of weeks ago last night imo he wasn't that far worse than many others it will be interesting to see what the Coaches do with him but he's still got a lot to prove if he's gonna be a regular or at least get another chance.