That would not be good. Leeds look, and play, so much better with him on the field than without him, but if he's not fit, he's not fit. I would have thought if Bluey was confident of getting even 30 minutes out of him he would play, rather than leave us without our two best big-game forwards.

well you clearly have seen as you typed it out, sheesh

Can't claim your earlier snipe as sharp.

That's my selection - end of.

The moral team.

HTH

From Andy Wilson at Wembley:

"confirmed, myler's out.

warrington team just been announced by smith pitchside: mathers; hicks, king, atkins, riley; briers, monaghan; morley, clarke, carvell, westwood, l anderson, harrison. interchange: higham, wood, solomona, v anderson"

Heard that too

If morals are your game then the subject of your man crush would maybe not have been allowed back to the club after offending.

Does Ryan Bailey know of your unrequited love? Does he think you're odd?

my source told me this morning ali wasn't playing

Clarkson has to be in


I would have Buderus on the bench, hit them hard with him after 25mins or so

My crush is on Clarkson at the moment if you must know.

Great talent and should play tomorrow. I have already declared on here that Clarkson is my highlight of the year.

As for TMFMISL - he will be vital tomorrow. His performance, alongsode the rest of pack, could determine th outcome. Good of you to pick over old news, well done.

His 'offending' was dealt with by the judicial system, if that's what you are hinting at. Surely he should be allowed to move on after 'justice' has been served like any other person.

I have selected a deserving team. Full of people who sweat and bleed for the shirt. You have a problem with that?

I think the fact that Myler isn't playing I good for us as Monaghan is much more dangerous player at hooker than at SH.

No problem, i like Bailey as a player and its not my opinion he shouldnt have been allowed back. Though your moral high ground is contradicted when Bailey, it can be argued, let the club and supporters down far more than Eastwood, or did you vilify Bailey at that time?

Deffo correct ,heard it yesterday.....my source...one of the rhino players

It's not contradicted.

You are picking 2 different events with 7 years between them and linking them as 2 + 2 = 4.

The 17 I have selected are most deserving. They play for us, they do a shift for us, they bleed for us.

That is what motivates me. I have seen enough half-assed players in Leeds shirts over time. Sadly Eastwood falls into this bracket IMO. His PERFORMANCES have not been close to what he is capable of on a week-in-week-out basis.

So on the playing side he's not a shoe-in.

He should count himself lucky though that he will likely be played. Burgess would have got the nod over him if fit.

He fancies playing in the final. Lucky Leeds. Remember the GF is in October, brrrrrrr, cold. May not make that one.

Which player?

Why should he tell you?