What reason would he have to go to VR. The only debate was the potential forward pass to Miller and VR can't give decision on that.

Since when did refs need a reason?

Lets assume that the referees are reasonably professional. If we can't do that then we might as well not have a game.

Let me spell it out: I was praising Kendall for backing himself in front of a hostile and baying crowd. There are plenty posts criticising his performance,  mine wasn't one of them.

Tom Holroyd banned for the Saints game.

He'll be a big miss.

At least it's only one gane. Probably Smith to loose with either Jenkins or Palaasia to the bench. Logically it's another chance for young Sinfield or return to the fold for Ackers. Cassell could be a long shot, but think it's more likely he would get a shot against Salford. 

A head shot? On who? Yet nothing for Newman, who's tackle was so severe Lewis failed his resultant HIA? 

Against the backdrop of being utterly ruthless against Salford. As in making sure we win the game, then significantly improving our for and against. 

Can we borrow the KR Solicitor?
2 players in Sue and Martin should not have played yesterday but they managed to get them both off.
I can`t remember the Holroyd incident so it cant be that bad.
Newmans vicious attack to the head of Lewis should have got him 6 games 

They'll rest some against Salford, they'd be mad not to, given the strong likelihood that we are going to be involved in play offs. I wouldn’t worry to much about Cassell not being ready. He's a big athletic lad who's already dominating in the reserves. A very exciting player. It was great to heat Iestyn Harris waxing lyrical (on the Lot Pod) about the talent coming through our system and how if we can get it right now we could be set fair for the next 10 years. 

Did the eye gouge allegation get chucked out by the disciplinary? Didn't look too much in it to me tbh