Quote Gotcha="Gotcha"Out of interest, you or anyone else, you don't think that Sinfield back in the side consistently is why we have been ahead of the pack this year?'"
Sinfield has played a key part in our second half of the season and of course will be missed but we stronger/more balanced in other areas than previous years which could still allow us to remain the leading contender like we are this year.
Also remember the big gap we built in the league table came from a strong start to the year. Sinfield started the year slowly and also missed the away wins vs Cas and Catalans and Wigan at home through injury and only came off the bench in the big win at Saints.
We did go through a slump mid season but can we honestly say it wouldn't have happened if Sinfield has been consistently starting every game?
We could lose some games next year due to lacking his game management but we could also win some due to having a more running threat at HB if Sutcliffe or Brierley for example play there instead. And we are scoring so many points with our style that the number of close games, the ones Sinfield excels in have decreased this year.
Also I don't the other side's have recruited in a way that with make major differences. Yes Wigan have Tomkins but will he be as good as before and to get him they've not strengthened in other areas. Saints look like they'll be pretty much the same and Hudds will again be their or their abouts in the hunt for a top 4 spot. Warrington are the team most likely to change but a lot depends on how Sandow does. If he disappoints then they'll be back to square 1 possibly and of course if we get Clark, who will they get at 9. If Farah then that's big, but someone else signing might not strike fear in other teams.
Don't get me wrong, we will miss Sinfield but think we can still be the leading challenger. If he stayed....
2016 - Sinfield, but no new hooker
2016 - new hooker possibly Clark, but no Sinfield
Which is worst?