It was a question not an assumption.

We are talking about SL not the NRL. Eastmond can play in postions from 1 to 7 in SL with very not many serious challengers.

He may or may not have an attitude problem which in any case could be sorted. But I have been talking about his rugby skills which have made him a double code International and he still is only 24.

The history of rugby league is full of instances where star players have regularly increased the gates. I was brought up on the likes of Lewis Jones, Brian Bevan, David Watkins, van Volllenhoven, David Watkins, Jonathan Davies, E.T.,Meninga,Bevan etc etc who all attracted larger crowds to watch them play but also a star player with the abilty to play a major role in winning games can also increase income by bringing success or even just the the promise of success. The short term signing of Andrew Johns and Adrian Morley were cases in point.

A star player need only bring in a 1000 or so per gate to bring in an extra 250k for their club but if he contributes to more wins and more exciting play then the attendance will creep up further.

The salary cap is in place not because of real star signings but rather to guard against foolish management making star salary offers to players who are no longer or have never been real stars.

I am sure SBW has increased the gates for the NZ matches dramatically and would do so if he ever nmoved to SL. Stars draw extra crowds in football and most other sports so why not SL?

This brings me back to the point that SL is suffering from a lack of real star players with classy attacking skills IMO.

The last paragraph is a bit strange - salary cap is so the clubs try and avoid going bust - although that still hasn't happened. Star players draw crowds because with them in the side the side wins more regularly which increases crowds as speccies love a winner.

The point is people trot out the old nonsense that star players bring consistently increased crowds - which is what they'd have to do every week to justify paying them a shedload. The reality is far less exciting, and Leeds fans in particular have seen the real impact time and again.

If it were true, then clubs would be able to sign star players, get crowd boosts and there really would be no need for a salary cap because it would be a self-sustaining virtuous cycle of sign star player, increase revenue, sign another star player.

I suspect it was exactly this kind of false logic which Leeds followed under Doug Laughton. That went ever so well. Widnes did the same with RU players, yet the increased revenue they got obviously got nowhere near offsetting the increased costs of their contracts.

As for comparisons to the NRL, the point is that if a SL side wanted to sign a class RL player today, and had the money to do so, there are quite simply better players 1-7 than Eastmond has ever shown in RL.

Professional rugby is in the entertainment business. The paying public would prefer to watch the best players and as I said previously history overall confirms that gates increase for most sports including League. Yes of course there will be exceptions. It was certainly not nonsense when Leeds signed Lewis Jones for a then record transfer fee (todays equivalent of be well over £400,000.) He not only increased the attendances at Headingley but at most other grounds he played on. The real stars can do that.

I repeat that I have been commenting on SL and not the NRL so your comparison is irrelevant to my point.

IMO SL is suffering from a dearth of true classy players at present which has in part been caused by Union going pro in 1995, the changes in exchange rate with the Australian currency and finally the increases in the NRL salary cap. To base your argument on what Doug Laughton did or imply that there is a wealth of classy star players out there for all the clubs to sign could be called false logic or even a red herring fallacy.

This is not in any way intended to denegrate our home grown stars but the imported stars were the icing on the cake. We now lack the opportunity to make those same big name signings. If you can produce home grown stars then all well and good but only a few sides are doing this and this cream is being slowly skimmed off by the NRL and Union. So if we ever the likes of SBW or Eastmond were to become available we would be foolish not to seriously consider them.

Where would the Premier League be without the biggest stars on the world stage?

If stars don't increase gates, why did Hanley have written in both his Wigan and Leeds contracts, to have a share of the gate over a certain number? That number was higher than they were getting before his signature.

Were Leeds home crowds any bigger with the likes of Hanley and Schofield in the side than they are now in the "beige" era?

Did someone really just put Eastmond and SB Williams in the same sentence?

I'd imagine even Eastmond's agent would be struggling to keep a straight face when delivering that line.

At this point a returning Eastmond would IMO add very few additional numbers through the turnstiles at any SL club.

Yes. You did. Just then.

On Twitter recent pic of Kyle Eastmond partying in Leeds with Bailey, Burgess, Widdop etc.

No but they went from around 9-10k in the late 80s early 90s to 12-13k

Yippee... That could mean all are playing for Leeds next season. Right .? Nothing like a bit of bonding to enhance better team spirit as proved with the England camp

Exactly.

That is not the point. We were not comparing eras otherwise I would have pointed out the Headingley record attendance of 40,175 or the Wigan record v Saints of 47,747 in 1959 for star studded sides.

The question you should ask yourself is what would the Headingley attendances have been like without the likes of Hanley and Schofield. I think I know the answer.

You speak for the paying public? Having watched many garbage teams in the 1980s littered with stars and having watched successful teams in the 2000s I know you don't speak for me.

Before my time but do you have any statistics to support those claims and, if you do, do you have any evidence to justify these alleged increased attendances being attributable to Jones rather than any other trends?

[codeWhere would the Premier League be without the biggest stars on the world stage?[/codeIt would be where it would be. Where it is is a league the offers little or nothing to in the way of junior development, nothing whatsoever to the international side and no chance to any club other than three or four to possibly win it. Great example.