If Hudds have Directors and officers liability insurance then that will pay out in cases like this. Most companies have it. Even though the reports say that Huddersfield Giants were taken to court, essentially its the board that's taken to court.

guess its not like normal insurance which becomes void under certain circumstances? ie by breaking the law

wood to partner brough next season

robinson and lunt to play hookers

yes hull kr paid a fee for eden

* Apologies for my intrusion *


If that was the case rlWhat Is This All About ?rl

Wasn't Anderson trying to sign a halfback through the winter to enable moving Robinson to hooker?

yes we were in for gaskell but nathan brown wasnt playing game

it is what it is.

No difference to a clause in a contract of a certain welsh half. You can put anything into a contract! It just means hudds get first dibs. All parties meed to be in agreement.

I think Harris was a different deal to Eden. The clause with Eden is that Hudds have first refusal should another team chase his signature. They also have the right to bring him back after two years if he wants to go to them. I'd be interested in the first refusal as I'm sure it'd be a case of Hudds having to match any other teams offer if higher.

Harris however was different. He switched codes. If he had stayed in union for the rest of his playing career Leeds would have got jot. However he agreed to us holding his registration in RL and that it'd only be released for a fee should he return to the sport. This kind of deal can only work f the p,Ayer leave the sport, and to be honest at he time as said by many in both codes it was a vet shrewd move. I highly doubt that kind of clause would see the light of day again

Pah. Who needs hookers? We can play without them.