indeed there is. you could quote to the context to make a little easier, but your cherry picked sentence is also fine, it also makes clear than Mclennan wishes no injury on anyone but understands they are part and parcel of the season. Thank you for proving my point for me.

if you find a statement which says that id be interested to read that

Thats nice, an odd thing to say considering thats not what we were talking about. We were talking about the Wigan players reaction to Mcguire not Mclennan. But nice for you all the same
can you find a statement where he says they caused Mcguires injury? if not you really need to apologise, you wouldnt want to look like a huge hypocrit would you?
And as they were made up, im making up its Burgess and Diskin and they fly the world in magical ford escort listen to an audio book of Jeeves and Wooster read by Stephen Fry doling out karmic justice to rugby league players

Going to be a good one I hope.

Wigan are the better side, but Leeds are proven champions with that ability to raise their game when it counts.

Can't wait.

I can't believe this 'no all the pressure is on', 'no its not its on you'.
I think if at this stage if you don't feel a modicum of pressure then you aren't human. Its how you deal with the pressure, Leeds in the past have shown they can handle it, while Wigan have yet to do so. Thise season is their best chance in many a year.

This will be a very difficult game - with our two best players against the most consistent side in the competition at full strength.

I would be amazed if we get through, but this team constantly amazes you - fingers crossed

Which part of McClennan's statement - [i"It's just the way it goes and we're not going to use injuries as an excuse for our position in the table. It's part and parcel of the season and other clubs will go through this too hopefully"[/i also says he wishes no injury on anyone?

its not taking anything 'favourably' if there was a way of phrasing what Clarke said which i wouldnt find offensive i would be happy to accept it could simple be poorly worded, like Mclennans. But there is no way of phrasing what Clarke has said which i would find palatable.

nope, no mention of intent again. Are you ready to apologise for your fabrication
im not offended by someone mistaking Mcguires collision with Carmont as a foul by Carmont. Its a little bit of nothing really

Clarke is supposed to independent - McClennan is not - simple really?

You cannot expect the impartiality from McClennan you should demand of Clarke?