It was Gilmour that Senior carried on with. If you have a look on tv after the Wilking incident, he seems to walk away from it all but thats when Gilmour then starts chelping to Senior.

On the replay you can see when the camera moves round that Senior is looking and having a go directly to Gilmour.

Dont know Gilmour to be honest but he always seems to be involved and a few of our players seem to have some ongoing issue with him.

seems to have a big mouth and be a very good at picking his moments to start chelping.

luckly (for his own safety) he also loves having a scrap

You're clearly confused.

Saints fans aren't saying anything about Gilmour because we know what he is like and we know that he and Smith have a thing going on. They really should get a room. That was six of one and half a dozen of the other.

Senior could be done for striking because not only did he strike out at Wilkin and miss (which was hilarious), he went back a second time just to make sure. That second effort could be seen as the issue. However, again, that could just be considered within the usual remit of a good bit of biff.

The chicken wing tackle by JJB on Jammer was not only a nasty tackle - and Jammer is having to have his shoulder examined as it has clearly suffered - it was an illegal one. Chicken wing tackles are illegal and thus JJB should have a case to answer and should get at least one match ban. He won't, but he should. There was no need for it at all. Jammer was tackled, quite clearly. No need to do what he did. And while Jammer may make a fool of himself occasionally with his hissy fits, he is a tough bloke and he normally doesn't show pain. I haven't seen a look of pain on his face before but it was definitely there for the Sky cameras last night.

The grapple tackle on Eastmond also should be looked at because of the pressure that was put on his neck. Again, probably nothing will be done but there should be some accountability for that because it is also an illegal tackle and once again, there was absolutely no need for it.

That might sort things out for you so far as Saints fans are concerned.

i think jjb should get a game ban.not sure he wasn't just trying to 'turtle' him but either way it was reckless.

in seniors case if everyone who threw a punch got banned then i would agree with you. warning letter IMO.

the grapple tackle was done by both teams a bit last night. again it was high and was a penalty only.

Do we have to. I'm sure I've got a life to get on with somewhere.



It does in my book.

Refs are refs, winning the penalty count is as good as it's ever going to get.

Do you think Keith will get away with using this defence?

Player intentionally has a jab at the St Helens player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the chin is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution

Works for the RFL with Keiron.

Good point,bet the whinging scousers have conveniently forgotten that incident

Lets see how fair the panel will judge this incident then
Now't in it imo apart from wilkin being bitch slapped

If I was on the panel I'd fine him £500 and tell him he'll get £1,000 next time if Wilkin isn't completely KO'd in their next match..

It should be compulsory to give Wilkin a dig early doors in every match, then let the grown ups get on with the game

What difference does the colour of the card make? It'd have made no difference with 2 mins to go. The RFL can still ban him, but I'm not sure it would warrant a ban on video evidnece. Not sure it was a proper punch, more a slap, so yellow card sufficient IMO