It wasnt a flicked pass. He went to catch it and didnt. Had he attempted to flick it to Sinfield then yes it would have been a forward pass. He didnt though, he attempted to catch it and knocked it forward.

Because it was knocked forward possibly?

i don't have a problem with it being chalked off,just how smith went about it by telling halibut what to give. that was bang out of order.

i still think the webb one was a joke though

Jones transfered the ball to another Leeds player. The ball did not touch the floor or another player or a post. It was passed on to the video referee who determined this transfer to go forwards, something he is not entitled to do.

HTH.

The ball flicked off his hands. It was a flicked pass.

What if the ball had hit the floor and been picked up by a Leeds player. It would still have been "transferred". Knock on or forward pass?

Yes. He ruled knock on because it was.

Compelling argument.

Night.

I thought both were to be honest, I now get the impression that referees are subconsiously penalising Leeds, having said that when they have Sinfield droning on in their ear all the time I tend to sympathise with them!!

TranslationI dont know the rules either. We was robbed!