Either system is acceptable as long as everyone knows the rules before a ball is kicked in pre-season and there is no changing the rules mid-season.

That way teams will approach every game working towards a fixed goal. That goal being to top the league or qualify well and peak in Sept/Oct.

The concept that every position on the league ladder matters and your next game is your most important right through to the GF in the play-off series works best for me. All the formats we've had during SL haven't quite worked, where there are second chances given and home advantage has been crucial but I still think the top 5 was the most credible of those we've seen.

Under the present system we could end up with a 7 V 8 final and given by definition the 8th placed team have to lose more Regular Round matches than they win their claim to being Champions would be pretty difficult to justify even though it was earned.

The regular rounds are just a money spinner for Sky.

A league schedule can never be entirely even. Head to head, with a suitable qualifying period to determine match ups, is the only way to decide the real champions.

Fantastic way to end any season in any sport, as regards all this about the team that wins the league been the best I dont think it holds up because that is not the aim of the season. In football the best team wins the league because that is the aim of the competition in our sport the aim is to win the grand final. Take away the playoffs and I think you would find more games of fuller intensity at the start of the season and the idea of peaking for the end would not exist.

I realise this could have been written in less words but if you cut through the waffle there is apoint in there

This.

It's the way we have decided our champions for the majority of the sport's history.

Good idea, but needs to revert to 6 (or preferably 5) teams. The team finishing 1st in the regular season deserves to only have to play 1 game in order to qualify for the GF, equally the top 2 deserve a 2nd 'bite of the cherry' at any stage of the knock-out stages.

Play-offs - Yes.
8 teams in it? - No, top four is about right.

imo the play offs have brought more meaning to all of the end of season matches.

for example,in seasons gone by the great wigan side of the 80's and 90's had already got the league title in the bag with still numerous league games still left to play,what else was was left for the other sides?
a shot at the old end of season premiership
I think it was about 1903 when we first had a playoff system of some description.

My only stipulation would be in a 14 team league, to revert to a top 6 playoff instead of top 8. Other than that, as tvoc says, as long as everyone knows the rules at the beginning of the season I cant see why its a problem to some people.

Yep, a format whereby the 5th placed team gets the biggest advantage.

Scrap the playoffs? No thanks. This season would now be done & dusted and the off season's quite long enough (from a spectating POV at any rate).

I preferred the top 5 version. I think it was unique to the sport and gave fair advantage reflective of finishing position.

Baldrick its the worst plan since Abraham Lincoln said " I'm sick of kicking around the house lets go take in a show"