Just because you think everyone is out to get you, it doesn't make you paranoid eh fella?

I've noticed a trend on here recently. If anyone disagrees with you, they're a fooking idiot. If anyone agrees with a poster who disagrees with you (which happens quite a lot amazingly), they're a bum licker or in a clique.

Perhaps you may wish to pause and reflect. You've been told by many different posters on here during the last few weeks about your tendancy to type something and claim you meant something different. I am pleased it's not just me. It's been posters that I have never met and do not know. Posters whose tongues have never been near my anus.

I think you need to tone down your aggression and maybe just proof read what you're typing before you hit submit, then you might have less issues and more credibility. I am sure you can put accross your meaning articulately enough during oral exchanges but you need to work harder on your written dialogue.

Just a freindly heads up.

Bless. Stop the sexy talk, and I wouldn't need to indulge.

I agree that Sinfields comments about McDermott go way beyond that of ass covering or towing the party line. There is being complimentary to your boss, and there is gushing praise on him. I think Sinfield is closer to the latter.

FWIW, my opinion the reason sinfield gushes so much is that the togetherness and belief that McDermott brings to the squad is unmatched. I think that the playuers want to play for each other. I think where we are missing is a real technical #2 who can work on the other aspects of the game which McDermott is not necessarily so hot on

That's my take on it too. Alternatively maybe there is technical proficiency there but it is deliberately being withheld for the playoffs with the coaching team taking the view that Leeds can get to the playoffs through grunt rather than exquisite rugby. Although that could be wishful thinking.

I have no idea how that proves anything about a clique.


Yes, I had.
It underlines the fact that your meaning is not the same as everyone else's.


Your giving (or not giving) of the aforesaid gnat's chuff is of total disinterest to me.

McDermott moved Sinfield from loose forward to stand-off, Sinfield has since generally defended one man in from the wing lightening his defensive duties in order to extend his career - IIRC Sinfield publicly lobbied for this positional change through the back pages of the YEP. Probably the same back pages where some time later he sung the praises of the current Leeds coach.

Some might form a subliminal connection between the two articles although obviously they would be entirely wrong to do so.

I wonder if you have the link to the former article?

Yeah it's not like Tony Smith played Sinfield in the halves in the 2004 GF, 2005 WCC & 2005 CC..........oh wait.

Given that McGuire was missing for the first few months of his reign then Sinfield moving to 6 was obvious.......but lets ignore all that common sense nonsense and invent that he forced his way there through a combination of demanding it/butt kissing.

i love re visiting these old posts and seeing how certain things pan out
this one from a couple of years ago was a belter,i have deleted his name in order that his massive ego remains intact

Put the text into google an it comes up pretty damned quickly

Watching as a neutral, I don't think Brian got his tactics right tonight. St Helens were there for the taking with that side out.

I'm sure a few of the 'McDermott Out' brigade may resurface tonight.

for the live of god Mcdermott sort your interchange policy out!!

good to see this one brought back after one close defeat.