Lunt gives something we are missing at the moment. Very good signing.

Those posting here who sit near me will have a wry smile now, as I predicted this and called for it at the Easter Monday game.

Lunt

Daylight

Moore

God knows what Lunts done, be a huge hole to fill and Moore certainly cant fill it.

Really pleased with this. He's a good player Lunt, and he'll add something rather than just filling a hole.

Astute move. McShane has not shown enough class to be considered as first choice and Hood while showing promise is not quite ready yet for a permanent step up. Without Burrow starting at 9 we have been below par and we need him on the pitch for the majority of games. It will be interesting to see if B McD uses a Burrow/Lunt combination at 9 to keep Sinny at 6 or if now we see Mags back to SO. Whatever the line up Lunt adds quality to the squad

I think you’re doing Moore a disservice here. Lunt is a great signing for us (even if only a loan deal) but Moore will fill the hole left more than adequately.

Most of you guys clearly rate Lunt very highly which makes the gamble on Moore even more surprising.

I think this also significantly strengthens our squad compared to having kept Pitts (I note that McDermott mentions that Lunt adds strength in a number of positions)

Wonder who will be going out on loan for us now?

Congrats on a great signing.

Giants must be nuts. Lunt is a great team man with a good attitude and great to watch.

Moore's traits have been well documented elsewhere.

Whilst i welcome the lad i wouldn't be so quick to write off Mcshane who imo hasn't had a very fair crack thus far.
I think Hood will go on loan and possibly Mcshane will follow once RB is fuly fit but like i said i wouldn't want to write any of them off.

There's clearly not much between Hood and McShane in the eyes of the coaching staff given the way they were rotated at the start of the season. Given how much more time McShane has had around the first team squad over the last few years than Hood, that would suggest they aren't convinced by him as a first choice hooker for a SL side.

When Leeds had success with Burrow off the bench at the end of last year, it often involved him coming on for one of the back rowers with Buderus shifting back into a loose forward type role. Lunt is the ideal player for that kind of role, so I wouldn't be surprised to see him starting at hooker with Burrow coming off the bench 20-25 minutes into a game and Lunt moving back to loose.

Rare for Leeds to get a loan player but I like this signing. It gives us plenty of options and allows Mac even more scope to totally bamboozle us with his team selections.

Lunt is a more than decent player with a good attitude...nicely understated here:
"My preferred position is hooker but I am happy playing in the back row as well, whatever the coaching staff want of me. I have trained with the Rhinos yesterday and the players really made me feel welcome. I need to get my head down now and work hard to make the most of this opportunity,"

Agree with the above. Think Lunt is a good loan signing but don't think mcshane and particulary Hood should be written off. Hopefully some loan spells with some first team rugby will assist

Leeds have a got a terrific player, an old-school hooker rather than the additional half-back type of dummy half. Close to the line, you'll not stop him.
Gilder has it spot on re the type of role he'll likely play at Leeds.

Depending on whether bridges have been burnt between Hudds and Lunt, it may not be that much of a gamble. Was he OOC this year? If not, they still get their player back, and have the chance to bring in a player with good potential in Moore. Its almost a win win situation all round

Think Lunt has this season and another 3 contracted to hudds