I see your point re: Bailey's longevity in the past, but it isn't just a different name is it? It's a young Kiwi international. With two other pack signings made in the shape of Amor and Bibb, and another year under the belt for Burgess.

Given all that, I would say it's reasonable to ask whether he'll be in the first choice 17. Some would say it's far more reasonable an assertion than the OP's . . . .



Lucky you

not sure how much impact kylie would have as an impact sub...

think he's probably best on @ the start

Yeah the young Kiwi should keep them all on their toes (as it should!!)

But with JP and Kylie knocking on we need to keep the pack fresh and current.

And as for the Burgess remark, this was said when Scruton was here. Like I said I've been here before many times and Bailey still stands!!

As for 'lucky me' - oh I know that!!!

I don't know, I actually agree with him.

You reckon she'd let me have a go?

I wouldn't take long and she'd barely notice?

I'd buy you a pint.

i like Bailey, I think he is a decent player. He has Great defence and contributes a lot. His biggest problem though is he sometimes doesnt offer enough going forward.

He is still pretty young, probably a year or two away from his physical peak as a prop (and only 1-2 years older than FGB) yet has a wealth of experience and has played against and beat, some of the biggest names in the world

I have always wondered though whether he should have had a few years in the 2nd row before moving up to prop at about 28 like Peacock did. Maybe he could offer more around the fringes at 2nd row for a year or two before moving up

I don't think he's ever been mobile enough for 2nd row. Had a decent run out tonight I think

1st Squad of 2010 everyone fit and available and who starts at prop???????

One of his best performances last year was at Hull KR, he played in a wide position there (before he got knocked out)

What yer questioning??

Make it a few pints and a pub snack of my choice and she's all yours.