Quote: G1 "The difference is I share a negative opinion of Kirke that is reinforced by his performances.
You give a negative opinion of, say, Burrow, who proves you wrong by winning a Harry Sunderland award or JJB who proves you wrong by winning player of the year, for example.
In other words, I know what I am talking about and you don't. It's fairly self evident.'"
And Ian Kirke proves you wrong by winning grand final winners ring's. To compare the worse of Kirkes performances to Rob Burrows best performance is way too bias and proves you don't have a clue what your talking about.
It's fairly self evident