You've been skirting around it FTV but you've let it rise to the surface. I knew what you were driving at from the outside but you tried to disguise it as a reasoned post.

The Saints fans' legendary arrogance.

We've had our Grand Final wins excused and devalued by fans of the "mighty S" and it was only a matter of time before our World Club Championships were devalued.

Only in the mind of a supporter of "the Entertainers" could a 38 nil defeat have more value than a World Club Championship win. The "team that revolutionized Super league" are so superior that even when they're trounced they're better than us.

On the eve of the season its' good to remind ourselves of the sheer delusional arrogance of Saints supporters.

Is this the same "Entertainers" who managed to average less than 12 points per game in their last 8 games?

Me writing about the Bulldogs team doesn't devalue your win years after the event. The game was devalued before it even kicked off due to the Bulldogs' shameful approach to it.



Getting beat 38-0 is FAR worse than beating half a team, I would rather we beat a team of blind schoolgirls than lose 38-0 - Leeds get to add the trophy to the honours board .



How is saying the Bulldogs had a fair few reserve graders and debutants on the pitch arrogance? It's the truth.

Does giving us reasons to laugh at them season after season not qualify them as 'Entertainers'?

The popular side fairy lights previously used at "The Saints Experience" at Knowsley Road give us at least another 50 years as The Entertainers, especially since they sagged into a boob shape.

If you don't know what I'm on about, search for something like Tommy Martyn Wonder Pass on a well known video site.

D. I. S. C. O.

Wow

it would have been more shameful had they fielded Ben Harris as you suggest,

Im not sure Bradford would have been happy about it either

You cannot compare the preparations of Melbourne and Leeds and suggest they are in any way even for the WCC. Leeds will have played at least two competitive league games. Melbourne will have played maybe one trial game (usually involving plenty of subs like our own pre-season games). That is what stops it being a genuine WCC IMO - sending over a weakened side is their problem entirely, just as it would be if the missing players were out due to injury.

Just as GB's series win against NZ shouldn't be devalued because the Kiwis sent a poor squad with a useless coach. We've done the same quite often....although possibly not on purpose.

I completely dissagree.

Melbourne started training long before Leeds came back to training, with them specifically saying that they are preparing for the WCC.

You can not compare the prepartions of this year to what the Aussies were doing 4 or 5 years ago.

There is only one thing that devalues the WCC

The apathy from supporters.

Yep, and its amazing how something becomes devalued by English supporters when an English team wins it.
The WCC is always quoted as "the difference between the 2 leagues" when an Aussie club wins it.
Yet is always "unimportant and unfair on the Aussies" when an English team wins it.

Forgive my ignorance, but I was under the impression that the missing players wouldn't have been fit for the WCC weekend irrespective of whether it was an NRL game, a WCC or a trial - given that most of those left behind are recovering from off-season surgery with the aim of being fit for NRL Round 1.