I don't agree in the slightest that it has lost public support. The early round games are not as appealing as they could be, and lower prices might well be an answer to that problem, but the cup still has a magic about it for a lot of people, and the final remains a big showpiece event. I think the assumption that low attendances = people not being bothered about the cup is a flawed one. Its true that a NL2 side isn't going to beat a SL side, but the cup still produces a few upsets every year, and a couple of SL sides got run fairly close by NL1 sides this weekend, so the possibility is still there. See Toulouse and KR's semi-final appearances in the last 2 years for details. I think you just have to accept that fans of top clubs are more interested in the later rounds because there isn't much if any doubt of the outcome in a match like that on Friday at Headingley, for example, but when the cup starts to throw up big games crowds will rise a bit, albeit not quite to SL levels (reasons of pre-paying ticket holders for example) but even Soccerball has that problem and there are no serious calls for the FA Cup to be scrapped.

Keep the Cup, its still a good competition, and the final will still be a big showpiece, and a time to put the game in the national spotlight. Which it needs.

Agreed.

This reminds me about the way the apethetic RL fan base moan and complain about the lack of investment in international Rugby League but fail to get off their fat, cloth capped ar5es and actually watch it.

Same thing here. Glory hunting fans who'll turn out in droves for the showpiece final and semi finals stay away from the earlier rounds (which have an important function for trickling down finance to lower clubs) and then come on here and moan about the state of the CC in the earlier rounds.

Here's the thing. If these games were better attended by fans such as Mr Bywater then the lower clubs would make more money from the ties thus enabling them to build their infrastructures. Maybe then the next time they get drawn at Headingley they'll be able to field a better side making for a more competitive match that will attract yet more fans, especially those of a fickle nature.

Why not just seed the Super League clubs in earlier rounds and make sure that they are drawn away. Therefore giving the funds to the lower leagues, and also creating more of a match than that you get when the lower teams play away at Super League clubs.

Would our fickle fekkwitts have beem more likely to attend in Workington than they would at Headingley? How would that have helped Worky?

Agreed. And there's plenty of lower league teams who'd prefer to play at the home of the bigger club, making the exercise somewhat pointless unless it was stipulated that they weren't allowed to switch.

The last paragraph is a crock of - we simply don't have the pool of players to improve at GB level let alone at the lower levels. FYI I have attended 3 CC ties this year so I have put my hard-earned into the pockets Stanningley, Leigh East and Keighley. How many have you attended Gareth? - one I suspect - 70% of your entrance fee going into GH's pocket - a big pat on the back for that.

I doubt very much that had the game been at Workington that it would have been much less of a crowd.

Anyway you forgot the main point of the post. David started this thread off with regards how can we make the cup more interesting. Personally I do think it would be a little more even if Super League clubs were drawn away to NL oppossion rather than at home.

You only have to look at yesterdays game between Widnes and Wigan for that. At JJB that would have been a walk over for Wigan.

That's a very defensive and presumptious post there David.

I'll happily respond if you could explain your serious allegation that 70% of Friday's gate receipts will have gone into Gary Hetherington's pockets.

How about SL teams having to play a certain number of u21's players in the cup and only 1 overseas player - dunno, scrapping it wont be an option so....

Quite - my point about the receipts is this - the revenues are split once you take off the expenses and VAT.

If we said average amount paid to watch the game was £8/head taking into account concessions - I have assumed all corporate, bar takings and food sales go to Leeds. Not sure about the programme sales.

So my calcs are as follows:

3,576 @ £8 = 28,608
VAT (4,260)
Net 24,348
Expenses (4,000)
Net 20,348

GH's share 14,174 70%
WT share 10,174 30%

The expenses are a guess they could be even higher - one thing is for sure GH will not be out of pocket.

The Challenge Cup gives us national exposure - it is the only games of live RL on terrestrial in the year - and means a lot more casual viewers of the game than otherwise. Of course the lack of interest in the early rounds is disappointing but is inevitable given the improved standards in SL vis. a vis sides in the National Leagues (except the top NL1 sides). However the final is still a showpiece event that makes up for this.

Personally, I didn't go to the game on Friday I had other commitments but I did go to the away game against Worky a few years ago. I would be more motivated to go to these games if they were away because it is more of an occasion and its good to see some of the grounds in the NLs with lots of history.

David,

Do you understand about corporate identity?

Why do you say this money will be going into Gary Hetherington's pocket?