Manly may not have been fully prepared but they weren't exactly in the same league as the team the Bulldogs put out against us in 2005. The WCC was clearly an intense match that Leeds raised their game for - or do you think they were playing at the same level in that game as they have been in recent weeks?

I'd prefer a Pint of Mild TUMFAM my Friend. We are at present, drinking Bishops Finger!

In terms of on the field performance, if you measure it in any other way than trophies won then we're in decline, and have been for up to two years now.

The overall objective of a sports team is to win trophies, but sometimes winning a trophy can mask definite weaknesses in a team that will have a longer term effect.

This is what last year's GF win did in my opinion.

The way I see it is you are going to fall into one of two camps:

1) You are happy to accept 3/4 of the season watching average to poor performances as long as there is some silverware at the end of it.

2) You'd like to see a cabinet full of trophies but not at the expensive of watching your team under perform for a majority of the season while getting the occasional spanking.

We'd all like to see a combination of great on-field performances coupled with some shiny stuff come season's end but that isn't happening right now.

Personally I think that the approach of easing off during the season to save yourself for the business end is the correct strategy. Since our poor tail offs in 2005 & 2006, we have succeeded in all but 1 of the last 5 grand finals. However, I think the balance last year and this year is wrong. I don't for one minute believe that the club has targeted to finish 7th or 8th. I'm not bothered about the LLS. Without the Sl trophy along side it, its meaningless. But I do expect us to be at least competitive with our rivals during the season. I think the fans are being a little short changed.

If it actually was a [istrategy[/i you might have a point, but hasn't McDermott already stated this season that the team were not happy with 5th last year and wanted to put things straight in that regard?

I don't think for one minute, especially after 2009 when the guys made a big thing about winning the LLS and the GF, that 5th last year was acceptable to anyone at the club - even with the GF win that followed. McD has said in at least one after match interview that he didn't want to "wait till the end of the season for a run of form".
Last year was a one off, we have some champion players who dug deep after pretty insulting treatment. I would be very surprised if normal service isn't resumed again (unless Wigan and Warrington bottle it again) and 1st and 2nd contend the GF.

Let's not confuse ourselves here, nobody regularly plays rubbish and wins things. The best teams win the trophies and the best teams play well. 2010 we played average and won sweet FA, prior to 2004 we played average for the best part of 25 years and won sweet FA. There is no "play poorly but end up with trophies" option. You play $h!t you win nothing - the two come as a package. Ask a Wakefield fan.

Leeds did last year.


If Leeds were to win SL again this season from 5th/6th position after regularly playing rubbish/poorly for most of the season, would you be prepared to reconsider that statement above?

No. Ask one of your SL whipping boy rabble supporters how many trophies they win by being crap every year or even any Leeds fan old enough to remember pre 2004.

Anyway, you always think whoever wins Stuporleague is rubbish, it's a rubbish competition.

Why do people think we are easing off as part of some great masterplan come playoff time? If we were easing off thinking of September/October time then why are we playing the same guys week-in week-out, the likes of Peacock & Delaney look knackered and still not given a rest. The team selection hardly smacks of a saving ourselves for later philosophy. We are losing because we are playing poor not because of some saving it for later plan.

Another difference this year is that there's not going to be an easy off-form Huddersfield away game in the middle of the playoff run.

Wherever we come 5th-8th, the first game will be winnable. Hull away would be the hardest, otherwise it'd likely be Huddersfield or Hull KR. Not certain wins, but games Leeds should win *if they're on playoff form*.

But then it would likely be St.Helens away then Wigan away to get to the Grand Final, and it's bloody hard to imagine managing that.

There are a lot of reasons why doing it from outside the top four last year was unusual, but a fixture list of Hull(h) Hudds(a) Warrington(a) rather than Hull(a) Saints(a) Wigan(a) was one of them.

I wasn't aware Leeds were whipping boy SL rabble.

Aren't they genuine contenders who (if they were to win SL again this year) will be proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is possible to be rubbish (strategic or otherwise) for the most part and still win silverware?

Because I have seen this team peak when it matters many times over the last few years. The difference in intensity between the WCC and the loss against Bradford only a few weeks later is marked. If it was just form these bad games would appear in key games as well. Over the last few years the only key game I have seen perform the way they are at the moment is during the CC final, otherwise they have been bang on in games that matter for the last 5 years, even if they didn;t end up winning all of them

I agree some players look knackered, and if I were trying to save something back for the end of the season I would rotate my squad better both on match day, and week to week.