Quote: LS13 "There seems to be a lot in the news of late regarding gang shootings over drugs etc. For those offences I'd say let them get on with it . They are doing society a favour by dealing with eachother. '" You’ve opened Pandora’s box here I’m afraid but lets embrace it Personally I think a majority of drugs should be legalised and alcohol should be banned because it only makes people angry. Now drug users only tend to get angry when they have a dependency on the illegal drug but can’t afford it so they go out robbing and that. Alcoholics only get angry when in drink. Drink does not calm people down IMO. American comedian Bill Hicks explains drugs in the best way - www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX1CvW38cHA

Quote: LS13 "There seems to be a lot in the news of late regarding gang shootings over drugs etc. For those offences I'd say let them get on with it . They are doing society a favour by dealing with eachother. '" You’ve opened Pandora’s box here I’m afraid but lets embrace it Personally I think a majority of drugs should be legalised and alcohol should be banned because it only makes people angry. Now drug users only tend to get angry when they have a dependency on the illegal drug but can’t afford it so they go out robbing and that. Alcoholics only get angry when in drink. Drink does not calm people down IMO. American comedian Bill Hicks explains drugs in the best way - www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX1CvW38cHA

This is getting a bit tad unfair now on LS13 and I would like you to stop please.

Personally I don’t think its even right for a 20 year old to go out with a 16 year old - I certainly wouldn’t. However Johnny I praise your relationships commitment and I hope to hear wedding bells sooner or later - commitment is what makes me smile in life. After all not all 20 year olds who go out with 16 year old are pervs and you certainly wasn’t. Its just that a subject like this divides a lot of us and would be best left to the side now IMO.

HH.. You mentioned that you were a couple and she was almost of age. That is different . It is still wrong though , and illegal .That would just deserve you getting a hiding from her dad if the family decided that BOTH your actions didn't warrant them reporting you to the relevant authorities There has been a lot of debate recently about the female teacherand a 15 yr old female pupil . They were a 'couple' , but that was still wrong and the teacher deservedly got a custodial . Any sex act with a minor is statutory rape according to the law .
Maybe I should have been more specific at the beginning of all this . I should have said that I meant the sickos that rape/tortue/kill the shildren .

I don't know why anyone is continuing the discussion.

You can't educate pork.

So after all this am I really naughty boy for my opinions ?












Shall i sit in that corner >>>>.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................V

I think there is actually an age where the offense differes. It may be 13, I'm not sure though. the punishments are much more severe below this threashold.

LS13's justice system is funny though. You should have a tyre punctured for doing 71 on a motorway, or it crushed for running a red light.

Maybe you should have your TV taken if found guilty of robbery?

Well done leicester_rhino..You getting the idea

Where does the death penalty exist for child abuse then?

I don't know . You going to tell me ?

You tell us.



What empirical evidence do you have that shows those who have abused children have not re offended where the death penalty is in place for such a crime.

Obsessed .
I was referring to the lack of re-offenders after they have been killed .
I was not referring to any specific type of offender .

HTH

No. Just attempting to educate a clown.



Ya dont say
Yup, it helps prove the point raised by G1

I was replying to a question posted by Gateaux .. Here is her question ...



Here it the reply ...

So where is the proof then?