The application of it, with the "I have a try" guesswork is amateurish. Haven't a clue how it works in football. As I say, either use it properly (which in reality means sparingly for glaring errors or where the ref is genuinely unsighted) or ditch it, yes.

For me, they need to do away with the guesswork of try / no try when the ref is basically sometimes just guessing.

Why cant we go down the route of conferring with the touchies / in goal refs then using the RU TMO version of - is there any reason I cannot give this try?

The problem here is that that leads to, or the perception of, the video ref looking for a reason not to award it. Unless it's only to look at glaring errors, but as we have seen, that soon turns into scrutinising the minutiae of the play.

There was nothing wrong with how the VR was used, but they insisted on following the NRL and bringing in the ref's call. It's ridiculous and should be binned.

Agree with that, bizarre when the ref call’s out I have a try. Then refers it to the video official. If in doubt refer to the video without any advice.

In the NRL, the ref never says 'I've got a try'. Seems to work much better that way.

The bunker also seems to make decisions far quicker than the multi screen, multi angle, slo mo, back and forth fest we have to endure.

Dearden is such a good player.

Richie Myler formerly of this parish appointed as director of rugby over at Hull. Interesting indeed.

The Leeds club president likely to invest in them also

this woman commentating on bbc is truly awful.

Not really. The bunker is a shambles

I didn't say they got the decisions right. But it's quicker than the mess we have. I'd do away with the VR entirely.

Jack Smith refereeing a quickish ruck. It can be done, apparently.

Who'd have thought putting sides under pressure through line speed, defensive aggression and resultant field position would yield results.