There's a job still to be done, no messing about with team selection sayIng "ahh it'll be ok".....it was the same attitude those posters were accusing the club of earlier in year and now they want to do it.

Yes we should beat Batley regardless of the lineup (but we should've been in the Top 8 also), but we need to beat them as heavily as possible. Yes it's a slim chance that we'll find ourselves relying on points difference but IT IS a possibility that isn't worth messing around with just to give some young lad 20 mins.

If we and Leigh get the job done we have two games left to try new lads. What are we going to find out about these lads if they come on 30-0 up at home vs Batley? Give them tougher opposition/games, but ones that don't have a bearing on the result. If we still need a result vs Hudds then also isn't it a good idea that we keep the same/similar lineup for this week instead of chopping and changing players who have already had a couple of weekends off recently anyways.

we have 50 points on HKR and 120 on Salford.

True, but if we were to lose our last two and HKR get themselves up to 10 points (they have two of the "lesser" Championship teams so could score some points) then that could change. Granted like I said it's a small chance, but it's a chance nonetheless and not one worth messing about with. I'd rather dot the i's and cross the t's and be ruthless and go for a cricket score this Friday.

Agreed. Not just from that point of view, but I also think the first team owes fans to put in as good a set of performances as possible.

Sound logic Printer. Injuries apart we should play our best side until the job is done.

And I have asked this a few times now, but nobody seems to want to state it. How is our best side been measured? What is our best side? we have had the same players out there, we have gone through games with other playes, and yet the performance is still pretty consistently the same, not good enough.

After Fridays game, I looked at that side, and of the starting thirteen, given a choice, I would gladly swap all but three of them tomorrow with players from other clubs. I don't think with regards two or three of them the difference would be that great, but the point is that all but three are just not that important.

I am comfortable that putting Smith in against Batley, would have no less effect than what we had out on Friday, and IMO would be better.

People will be measuring on historic performances and short term potential. No one is saying that right now Ablett is playing well enough that Jordan-Roberts or Smith couldn't do the same job but if Batley come out and really put some pressure on us then Ablett is the better pick as he has more experience and at the moment has a higher skill ceiling.

FWIW I would go

Golding
Handley
Briscoe
Keinhorst
Hall
Sanderson
Lilley
Garbutt
Segeyaro
Cuthbertson
Ablett
Ward
JJB

Burrow
Smith
Singleton
JJR

Start with a lot of experience in the pack to make sure we get an early foothold and then once we're clear give the youngsters a go.

Leeds 22 Batley 23

Because it's pointless anybody saying what they think the best 17 is as you'll just say so and so is rubbish and shouldn't be in the 17.

When people say strongest 17 it's easy to work out what that would be by McDermott's past selections on what he deems his strongest available side to be. If he picks youngsters that have 2,1, 0 appearances to their name then we know he isn't picking what he thinks his strongest side is, but rather picking them for other reasons whether that be to rest them, form, have a look at a youngster.

It isn't what I think, but thanks for the compliment that you worry about that.

The point is more, how is it measured full stop. People are saying strongest 17, and seem to be basing that on previous years, rather than this year, where we have consistently seen the same players (allegedly our strongest) putting in below average performances. That is why I asked what is the strongest line up they refer to. What they really refer to is our "usual line up" which isn't it would appear the same.

Play our strongest team and get the job done. Simple as that. No messing around with Youngsters.

You got "worry" from that? Erm ok then. Just pointing out that it'd be pointless for people to name the strongest 17 in reply to you because you'll just moan about Carl Ablett's inclusion like you have done for the last few years now.



They are basing it on exactly the same thing as you, who they think would be the best choice.....that their lineup would differ from yours doesn't change that because not everybody has the same opinion on individual players performance.

When people say strongest 17 you know what they mean. Question, if this weeks game was against Hudds would you be saying lets have all of Smith, JJR, Hallas, Handley, Mullally in? Would any of them been in your 17 to play Salford last week or against HKR both in the Middle 8's or the final week of the season when we needed to win to get up to 9th?

If not (which we all know they wouldn't be if you were being honest) then right there you have your answer about strongest 17.

I see the usual deflection of a point from you. Not sure what one player has to do with anything, when I have repeated several times we are talking about most players. Other times I am accused of having favourites, yet you only have to go back to season before last to see my favourite was Carl Ablett, now it seems to suit you to say I have had a problem with him for "a few years". For what it is worth, he is one of many who has not done enough to warrnt his shirt this season.



They are not basing it on the same as me at all. I have already asked what is our strongest 17, and I asked that because I do not know. All I do know is that the "usual line up" which seems to be trotted out all the time, have continually proven they are not earning the shirt. They might be picked in it, but they are not earning it. And with that in mind, without seeing the other options given a run, I don't believe anyone is in a position to state it is the strongest 17. And if it really is our strongest 17, then we are in bigger problems than people accept.

If I had to be honest, I would probably have to answer reluctantly yes to the question you asked. But that was exactly the reason why I suggested we should try out other options against Batley. Then we would have a better idea, and I am confident would find a better alternative.

Wrt best 17 imo it has to be "on form" over a number of games of course we all know Mc.D has his favourites whether in poor form or injured.
This game would be ideal to blood Cam Smith Oledski & JjR imo but whilst we arent mathematically secure i cant see em getting a run if at all till Leigh at home.

Most folks would consider the strongest side to be based on proven performance over a long period. Much of the success for Leeds has come from experience and mental toughness that has become part of the culture for a generation of players. This season has been the exception and not the rule and a majority of our "strongest" players have been out injured for much of this season so have been sitting in the stand as we lost matches we could have won had they been on the field.

I am all for blooding youngsters and giving them a chance when injuries strike or when the pressure is off but must win games are not the best place to take the gamble on them. Our experienced players whose historic efforts of last season do not deserve to be cast aside quite so quickly.