I fully agree with you. Warrington are possibly the best side in SL and were clear favourites before the game and the pre match worry for me was to stop them getting their usual flyer and being out of sight by half time. Remember the last time we played them at Wembley under a different coach and most of the side was 2 years younger?

We were in the game at half time and for a brief spell had the lead. Warrington were easily the best side on the day but had we not given those stupid penalties away it could have been quite a different scoreline.

We went into the game without two of our key strike players. One injured and one in disgrace. The other key strike player Burrow was possibly not fully fit and lacked his usual zip. Warrington had a good game plan to close down both Sinfield and Burrow and did so to crucial effect including a bit of biff. Yet despite these handicaps, and 4 of our 5 props being below par on the day, the game was finely balanced until our discipline let us down in the 2nd half.

So the conclusion for some is to change the coach!

The most delusional post EVER on Southstander.com

I keep coming back to it and p!ssing myself laughing. It is truly brilliant.

Yes, you got what you deserved, sadly the players didn't. You don't deserve to support this team.

So, do you want to replace the threequarterline from yesterday, if they're "done"? You want to replace Ward?

Let's just replace fans like you who haven't got a fekkin clue what they're on about.

Woah, I missed that one.

Take a well earned break.

Funniest......post........ever.

You trying to outfo your Phil Daly post? Good effort if so.

I Think you have some good young players however some of the older guys are not quite what they were and it matbe time to look at phasing them out burrows baily jjb etc

I feel you would benefit by rejuvenating the pack and accepting mediocrity for a season or so for the younger guys to gain experience

The players got what they deserved on the day for their performance.

Is that the same McDonut who handed them their s in last years play-offs ?

Yes, didn't you read in my post where i said ''i want to replace ward and the threequarter line''?

Amazing post. Lovely stuff.

Coaching a team to every available final is conclusive prove that he's not good enough, apparently.

mc dermot imo is a top coach and given time im sure he will improve on the cc performance, if he is given time to buil his own team. ward is a cracking prospect and am sure a la myler will come good under the guidance of mcguire.

i think id start looking to replace burrow as with the money he is im sure there is sum1 better suited for the future. Top flight sport is ruthless and not one for sentiment he has been outstanding in the past and am sure that he gives 100% but if that 100% is no longer good enough....

No, I read the 1st page and couldn't be bothered with any more. I apologize, I have under estimated the scope of your stupidity.

Just because we didn't lose the game in the first half but rather the second doesn't change the fact that we were really outclassed at times. The way the score went happens in RL a lot - outmatched team struggles to compete and stays in the game for a while, but then falls away when the better team turns up the heat.

The threequarters are the least of our worries. The pack almost to a man is average without any linebreaking ability whatsoever (I suspect opposition coaches of half-decent teams barely need to worry about tries being scored up the middle from short range, we simply have no punch at all). We already have too many chiefs even before McGuire comes back, but bizarrely even with so many 'playmakers' look to have absolutely no clue near the line against a committed defence. Our defence was back to its 2010 sieve-like worst for long periods, with no control over the tackle at all.

I doubt a really good coach would make much difference, as the 'surgery' that needs to be done is fairly major IMO - we're 2 or 3 CLASS forwards shy at the moment.

Added to the above, picking a centre on the bench (and a decidedly average bench at that) with the plan to move one of the threequarters is bonkersville. we would also have been far better served with a Clarkson type forward adding mobility at 13 than a prop who simply looked all at sea as to what his role was supposed to be. The responsibility for those sorts of decisions and the lack of structure and rubbish defence belong to the coach.