That does surprise me, from someone who uses the word 'un-molested' on a rugby forum.........

Note the prefix "un."

Anyway, I never said I was aversed to all p0rn, it was specific to Gotcha's weird animal images.

Thanks for that Tony.

Still not rammed with Leeds players (bar Harris - who obviously had to be in there in '9icon_cool.gif but perhaps will be when the spaces are filled in.

4, 10, 12, 13

Possible chance there for Godden, Fleary, Morley, Farrell and Glanville to challenge for inclusion?

Looks like Morley was 10

[i10 - Adrian Morley, 1998, 1999, 2009[/i

You'll do for me. It's like you're on a mission .... impossible.

Just 4, 10 and 13 to go.

Lovely stuff.

So Leeds did have a rep in 1998?

Well, you've been so obsessed with the whole "been/being" issue for so long, the rest of the English language was going to pot. Somebody had to man up and get the situation under control.

Focus. Don't set side-tracked. You're on a mission remember.

None the less, the word 'molested' is still on your radar, weirdo.

OK, I will try and interpret your gibberish and respond to what I think you were trying to say.

OK, I think you're trying, bless you, as best you can, to say that it's foolish to use a player's omission from the Dream Team as an indication that said player is not "good enough".

If that is what you're trying to say I should point out not only can you not type a sentence that is English (and I am not picking on typos, your post was gibberish) but that is not what I was actually saying.

I'd agree with your attempted proposition that it doesn't mean a player isn't good enough just because they don't make the dream team. However, when certain posters tell us that Buderus is head and shoulders above any other hooker in the league I think his lack of recognition by players and media alike for any individual honours during his time in Super league is good indicative evidence that is clearly not the case. If he were head and shoulders above, say Monaghan and Roby in anyone but Bywater's opinion I am sure he would have been so recognized.

I've put this through the gibberish translator and it says you're claiming I've been inconsistent in claiming Hall is the best winger in the league but I can't claim that because Hall didn't take one of the two available wing spots in the Dream Team.

I can see some logic to that argument. I Gave my opinion that Hall deserves inclusion. I think that was a reasonable opinion. I don't think it's comparable with the Buderus situation because.

1. Hall has, unlike Buderus, gained selection over the last three seasons.
2. I've never claimed Hall was "head and shoulders above" any other winger in the league. I can see why Briscoe and Monaghan are there, I just think Hall should be ahead of at least one of them. You appear to agree, BTW.

Speaking as a hull fan, Yeaman is a brilliant defender, and if Macnamara's worried about Briscoes defensive positioning ( which i have the full confidence in ), what better to do that play Yeaman inside him who he's been playing with all season.
For the record i think Yeaman was very lucky to get in the dream team.

Yeamo's defence isnt as solid as i'd like, but like you say, when he's there he's there. I'd like to see him play international rugby again but I think McBanana will over look him again.

surely not as both senior and gleeson won't be available for selection this time around,although id expect if both were available next season that they could both easily oust yeaman though