Which it wasnt.

Who has said that?

I had no issues with his performance.

He was balanced in his decisions and he had no influence on the outcome of the game, which is exactly what I want from a referee.

i think thats all most people want!!

it nice not to get mullered in the penalty count for a change

One poster suggested there were "no big issues" from his performance at the weekend. The fact he missed a knock on so blatant as the one Kallum got away with on Sunday would suggest otherwise.

I actually agree with most of your sentiments. I didn't think M. Alibert was that bad on Sunday. He just missed a couple of things that you'd expect any referee to pick up.

I still had no big issues.

I agree with your second paragraph but you could flip your last sentence.

He missed a couple of things that you'd expect any referee to miss.

No biggie from me.

Have some seemingly inocuous posts dissapeared or am I dreaming things?

Hmmmmm. Interesting.

A gentle and general warning.

If anyone poster wishes to make serious allegations against another poster without the evidence to back it up then they will be taking a permanent holiday from the site.

My sources tell me some offence may have been felt from one of the posts. Which is fair enough, though I hadn't read the comments to be aimed at anyone that way, but overall no issue with it.

Which is fair enough.

I would expect that Mr Cummings, when reviewing the game yesterday, to take a different opinion.

its been highlighted

In whcih case I shall keep my powder dry about what the poster known as Puig Aubert was seen doing to a monkey at a recent visit to Knowsley Safari Park.

Yeah a few of my posts have been removed.

ha, that's where you're wrong.

You should be very careful about making assertions like that.

Ok, so I bummed a monkey but it was at Chester zoo, on top of the souvenir shop.

There's nothing you or the Southstander guy can do about it.