Flanagan or Griffin for me . Both know the game both know youth development and both are winners . At this moment in time they are the best out there . People are deluded if they
Think Wane and Marshall are genuine candidates. Going with the lowest common denominator has been the reason we are where we are both on and off the field . Time for
Quality change right across the board .

100% agree

Those guys will want complete authority on the rugby side. After seeing what happened to Furner they'll also (understandably) want locked in payouts in the event things go south. Will the club be willing to bring in a coach on that sort of basis?

Exactly.

Its Agar's job to lose

Well, give him a decent squad and he's probably capable of at least marching us up the table.
I don't have a huge problem with Agar, pending our performances over the next few rounds.
If KS wants to keep his oar in the water, maybe we need to go down another path where we have several specialist coaches under him. We will really struggle to find a first class head coach who is willing to be held accountable for somebody else's decisions.

Daryl Powell...

I'm a little stuck here. For me, a coach coaches. A coach gets the players on the training area and shows them how they want the game played. A coach gets what he wants out of the players. For me, Graham Murray was a perfect example of this.

A manager, manages. They look after the discipline, conduct, availability, timetabling, organisation, press commitments, the day to day running of the team that allows the Coach 100% bandwidth to Coach the team.

A Director sits above these two and Directs operations, makes sure sufficient resources are available for the Coach and Manager to do their jobs. A Director can be Financial, Operational, People, Marketing, etc etc. In this case Rugby.

I have never seen this not be the case. GH was Director, there was always a Manager, and always a coach.
It seems now that GH has separated his role of effectively MD to allow him bandwidth to fill Caddick's responsibilities on the board. Is Sinfield the right person to fill what effectively is a role for someone to figurehead a process that up until now was working very well, his Masters in Sports Business would suggest so. His experiences similar.

I would suggest time will tell. BUT. To quote G1 (in a nutshell) from a decade ago when Leeds were struggling and recovered to finish 5th then win the GF, twice. If Leeds are there or thereabouts come October, this thread will be a distant memory.

So, the following coaches are available:

Flannagan
Griffin
Wane
Marshall
Sheens
Tony Smith
Agar
Justin Morgan

Some good options there.

If we are looking to advance get back to the top, then we can eliminate Wane, Marshall, Sheens, Agar, and probably Smith off that list as head coach.

Disagree on Wane. Others agree

I've no idea what the situation is with Flannagan but any coach who can win the G.F. with the Sharkies must be really good.

I don't know what Sinfield would make of him though.

Sheens negotiating a release from hull kr to take up a coaching offer