Out of interest what relevance does that have, when the thread is about one match, not a season?

Just to clarify to ensure any knee jerking defensive feckw1ts have not got the wrong idea. The last sentence on the opening post.



Some people will never learn.

Is it?



So it's about time we started blaming the coach after one game then?

Knee jerking fekwittedness at its absolute maximum.







Yeak, OK. Whatever you say

Yes it is, hence the comment on one match and the choices for that one match.

I won't respond to the rest, you will just make yourself look stupid.

There's only one person looking stupid here and that's you. It doesnt take me to make you look stupiud either, you do a fine job yourself.

You said



By that I'd take it as based on the seasons performances it's now time to blame McClennan.

You argued against this, instead saying it's just based on this games selections and thus it's time to blame the coach based on his selections in this game (which at the possibility of being rude is a high level of fekwittery).

You then contradict yourself.




Based on the whole season or just on this game?



Ah right, so just this game then.



Confirmation. It is just this game you mean.



Hmmm. I'm not sure again now. You see if we're just basing it on this game then you're saying he needs to start doing his job based on this one game.

Are you criticising the coach based on just this game or the whole of the season?

Why didn't you just quote the post properly?



It's quite clear to read, and the full post even goes on to point out reasons from the one game.

Danny, you lose out everytime these days, just leave it and move on. The childish posting becomes tedious and boring for all.

If there is anybody else independent from the silly posters, who truley believes the opening post gives a view any different to commenting on the one match, then feel free to let me know.

Fine.

I think it's safe to assume you're blaming the coach based on his actions in [sizeONE[/size match.

That's laughable.

I can understand you spouting the same old tedious line about it being tedious when you've made a fool of yourself yet again.

Why don't you do your usual and throw in the one about aliases and we can all go to sleep.

Not required. It doesn't matter which alias it is Danny, you still lose out with the pathetic trolling everytime these days.

I don't know if you have something on the mind, but you are pretty poor this last six months.

Oh dear.

Academy results mean nothing.

There is something not quite right you say...ok...yet we still keep producing quality players for our first team.

Would you be posting this if we had won?

Somehow I doubt it. When you have an injury ravaged team low on confidence....people are gonna play poorly.

I blame injuries, not the coach.

You're right on the first part.

Since Ryan Hall made the breakthrough into being a first team regular though, who has followed him?

The McGuire/Burrow/Sinfield/Diskin/JJB/Bailey crop was a freak, that's not going to happen more than once a generation - you do have to question who of the current academy setup is going to be next to make that transition though, and why if the production line is still churning out "quality players" Leeds feel the need to be picking up the likes of Coady, Pitts and Amor.

Your u18's got their season underway on Sundayhttp://www.warringtonwolves.org/victory-for-wolves-u18s-3227rl

Luke burgess, kallum watkins and BJB. Burgess is a regular and BJB and watkins will become super league regulars within 2 years probably.

Alot of people because of that ''freak crop'' expect miracles but we are still producing quality at a reasonable rate.

Good point plus i'd expect to see Mcshane,Ambler and there are younger prospects in Hood,Bravo etc.

dont think the full un18s team played , but yes it was a pasteing 18-66 is some pasteing too !