There was no concise evidence to weather he was offside or onside, so the benefit of the doubt was rightly given. RE to watkins, he has alot to learn but I still think he has a great future ahead of him.

What he said!

You keep thinking that then, if I was trolling I would just come on with blatant ones like "Leeds are e" etc.


You've agreed with the point I made, so it obviously held some validity, I like to see a team do that, time it perfectly to the ref's whistle, all i'm saying is that Leeds got beaten at their own game tonight.

I agree with that, he's certainly heading in the right direction with gettin experience like the WCC under his belt.

Ah, so a bunch of guys that either played very little, or none of, their GF winning season. Thought so. We were in the same boat missing Ablett, Donald and for a large part Sinfield.

They weren't though.

They were delighted at the end to have played at 70% and won.

You’re obsessed with our board – you post more in her than you do on the Bulls board.

I bet you were one of those kids who pulled the hair of the girl you secretly fancied.

I think you'll find I post far more on RAB than Substandard, but I enjoy posting on most teams boards after they've played - See my post on the Wire, Pies, Stains forums amongst others.

BTW

LOL at Backtobacktoback

What a gomper.

....and we get penalised for it.

I never said it was the reason we lost it was just a very irritating refereeing performance.

agreed.

I watched it on TV and his shouts were the annoying part.

Too much ''MOVE MOVE MOVE'' when leeds were defending and too many surrender calls against leeds (despite what happened in the collision).

And i beleive thats what senior was protesting when he was penalised, silverwood was calling surrender when our player was still driving forward.

Not really.

Leeds lying on is a myth, we probably get penalised more for other infrigements than that particular one, and we only do it as much as the opposition does it.

Mlebourne didn't ''time it perfectly to the refs whistle'' they simply did what he instructed. He kept calling surrender which allowed them more messing around time.

If you believe that then you must have been watching a different game. Granted they played to the conditions ....but to say they played at 70% is a bit daft.

Your right, nearer 60% i would say.