FORUMS > Leeds Rhinos > OT - Refuse Workers Benefit |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 6881 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2021 | Aug 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: totalloiner "i don't think they were but thatcher wanted revenge on the miners for the threat of strike action in 1981, and after she took us into conflict in 1982 to win a general election in 1983 she had her chance to crush them, if the deputy's hadn't have gone back to work and got paid weather they did or not she'd have lost that battle aswell. i lived through the miner's strike 84-85 my dad was a miner, there are things the government of the day did to bribe the lad's back to work that never came to fruition i'm just glad my dad had enough pride not to be bribed and stay put. but it's a long time ago. but i'd never vote tory'"
I hope this doesn't descend into chaos but here's my twopennorth.
Looking back, I remember the miners strike, and the aforementioned conflict. And whilst my father wasn't a miner, he was a soldier, as was my Uncle, and both served in the Falklands. My other Uncle was a postie and was a member of the Grimey band, and continues to blow with miners bands all over.
The idea of Thatcher using the conflict to win an election (and I certainly don't come across this as a universal truth and or opinion) is a line I do hear from miners and ex miners on a regular basis. I don't hear it from the soldiers who went to the South Atlantic, which seems at odds with this line of thinking. What makes it even more crass is that a lot of miners did very well from the redundancy packages they recieved, some of them from several pits, and have since done quite well from VWF, tinitus, emphesema etc whilst the rest of the population has had to just get on with the ailments caused by their trades.
And yet the miners still hold themselves up as objects of pity. And I get it almost every time I go down the club to sit with a bunch of men who haven't worked a day since they left the pits because they haven't needed to.
Oddly enough at the time of the Argentine invasion the RN was in the process of being disbanded, piffle you may say, but it was. The need for a Navy was massively low on priority in Monetarist circles. The 1982 conflict enabled various chiefs of the defence staff to secure funding to continue with the development of the Navy and various programmes, Rapier, Harrier, MLRS, which proved vital 9 years later.
The monetarist line was I admit, harsh and cold, and Thatchers battles with the Unions are often thrown up as examples of her brutish and calculating approach.
I do however find it a little frustrating that the actions of one government (that in reality halted the counterproductive effects of the unions,see France at the moment) have permanently affected your ability to make balanced,reasoned and evidenced voting decisions on your own. How can anyone say "I shall never vote X". What if the policy if your chosen party was so at odds with market common sense and the opposition policies sat much more in line with what was best for the country in the longer run? Would you just not vote?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3224 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2018 | May 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| No doubt she chose her moment well, coal stocks were at their highest levels ever at the power stations, but I don't really want to get into a "Thatcher is the root of all evil debate"
But if memory serves me right, there was no strike ballot, and I think you'll find that it was the arrogance of Scargill who railroaded the mining industry into the ultimately disastrous strike, which decimated the industry.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 10757 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I grew up in a midlands mining town My dad wasn't a miner but my grandad was, as was our neighbour. The perception amongst many at the time of the strike was that Arthur was arrogant (as per Billy's point on the ballot) and also that this rubbed salt into the feeling that when local pits had been threatened and closed under a labour government he hadn't supported a call for industrial action - in other words that he was just as political as Thatcher was.
I don't think there is any question that Thatcher welcomed an opportunity for confrontation with the miners and had prepared well for it - remembering her predecessors disasters of 1973.
As regards the Falklands I don't believe the conflict was sought but she certainly seized the opportunity to turn into into a jingoistic festival. Without that she would very likely have lost the next election.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 18060 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2023 | Jun 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: JohnG "Do you know the company I work for?? Have you seen any of its financial figures??
Our parent company has just paid off several hundred million pounds worth of debt and also raised hundred of millions by selling some shares it had in another company.
My company has paid £300million in cash back to the parent company and we have an order book somwhere in the region of several hundred million and prior to any announcement on redundancies had a forecast profit in excess of £100million.
Does that sound like a company in trouble?
Now perhaps you can stop putting words in my mouth and stop your petty insults.'"
A profit of £100m - some things to consider:
1. How much capital you have employed to generate that profit
2. It also depends how much of that profit is operating profit
3. What does the cashflow position of the company look like - as the saying goes profit is sanity but cash is king
4. What are the long term order books looking like - it could be they don't look so hot so it makes prudent sense to downsize now in order that supply of labour matches matches demand for product two years down the line - that is the job of management - strategy!!!
Maybe you could answer these questions rather than getting on your high horse - then we can have an informed debate or you could just name the company we can get a set of accounts from companies house and continue the debate based on fact rather than annecdotal notions
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1125 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2017 | Aug 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Serge A. Storms "A profit of £100m - some things to considerThat is operating profit
3. What does the cashflow position of the company look like - as the saying goes profit is sanity but cash is king Good - they wouldn't have sent £300m to the parent co. if it wasn't
4. What are the long term order books looking like - it could be they don't look so hot so it makes prudent sense to downsize now in order that supply of labour matches matches demand for product two years down the line - that is the job of management - strategy!!! stated in my post
Maybe you could answer these questions rather than getting on your high horse - then we can have an informed debate or you could just name the company we can get a set of accounts from companies house and continue the debate based on fact rather than annecdotal notions'"
Whilst you have asked valid questions (even though one of them shows you didn't read my post fully) you still have to end up with the typical sort of dig that is typical of many on here.
Such a shame that many of you cannot have a serious debate.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 32466 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: JohnG "Whilst you have asked valid questions (even though one of them shows you didn't read my post fully) you still have to end up with the typical sort of dig that is typical of many on here.
Such a shame that many of you cannot have a serious debate.'"
So if it offends then ignore the last sentence and answer the serious questions, you can't have a serious debate if you are not prepared to contribute.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1125 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2017 | Aug 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: McLaren_Field "So if it offends then ignore the last sentence and answer the serious questions.'"
I have answered the serious questions
Quote: McLaren_Field "you can't have a serious debate if you are not prepared to contribute.'"
Unlike some on here, I can't answer posts at whatever time of day they come in at and I cannot see how you can imply that I haven't contributed.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 32466 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: JohnG "I have answered the serious questions
Unlike some on here, I can't answer posts at whatever time of day they come in at and I cannot see how you can imply that I haven't contributed.'"
Well if you just look a couple of posts above this one you'll see one that asked some questions for you to answer, you preferred to complain about a dig at the end rather than answer the questions.
I appreciate you may not be able to but they do provide some insight into the issues that you raised on the previous page, why ignore them ?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1125 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2017 | Aug 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: McLaren_Field "Well if you just look a couple of posts above this one you'll see one that asked some questions for you to answer, you preferred to complain about a dig at the end rather than answer the questions.
I appreciate you may not be able to but they do provide some insight into the issues that you raised on the previous page, why ignore them ?'"
If you read my response again you will see that I have put my answers in bold in the quoted post from Serge A. Storms.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 32466 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: JohnG "If you read my response again you will see that I have put my answers in bold in the quoted post from Serge A. Storms.'"
Move along please, nothing to see here...
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 10757 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: McLaren_Field "Move along please, nothing to see here...
Ha!
Take that capitalist oppressor!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 18060 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2023 | Jun 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: JohnG "Whilst you have asked valid questions (even though one of them shows you didn't read my post fully) you still have to end up with the typical sort of dig that is typical of many on here.
Such a shame that many of you cannot have a serious debate.'"
OK name the company and we will be able to get a set of stat accounts from companies house and we can verify that what you say is correct and have a serious debate.
£300m cash contribution to the parent? was that just a repayment of funds lent to the company by the parent in the first place?
So many imponderables - just name the firm what's the big secret?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4482 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2015 | Feb 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: JohnG "
Does that sound like a company in trouble?
'"
They are making a sixth of the workforce redundant so yes.
Quote: JohnG "
Why would a financially stable company axe over a sixth of its workforce if it wasn't for fiscal reasons?'"
He evidently can't answer this.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 93 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2020 | Jun 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I live down south nowadays, so forgive me if I've got my wires crossed...
But I was told that 'one' of the reasons the refuse guys were being asked to take a paycut was due to the council's oversight in not reacting to the 'equal pay' issue that raised it's head (via europe?) 3 years or so?
The council are now under pressure to be seen to pay equal wages to men/women, so rather than raise the wages of the female staff, they have opted to bring the men' wages down to the ladies level - and in turn, save a load of cash.
Like I say, I don't know if this is true or not - but either way I think the whole thing reflects really badly on the council - unless of course all the council bigwigs are also taking a 20/30% cut....
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 18060 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2023 | Jun 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: MonkeyMonkey "I live down south nowadays, so forgive me if I've got my wires crossed...
But I was told that 'one' of the reasons the refuse guys were being asked to take a paycut was due to the council's oversight in not reacting to the 'equal pay' issue that raised it's head (via europe?) 3 years or so?
The council are now under pressure to be seen to pay equal wages to men/women, so rather than raise the wages of the female staff, they have opted to bring the men' wages down to the ladies level - and in turn, save a load of cash.
Like I say, I don't know if this is true or not - but either way I think the whole thing reflects really badly on the council - unless of course all the council bigwigs are also taking a 20/30% cut....'"
If they raised the wages of the females it would require a hike in the council tax of approx 18% - a non runner.
And law suggests the ladies in the office should earn what the bin men earn - not sure if that is correct but that is how I read it
|
|
|
|
|
|