FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > Leeds Rhinos > OT - Refuse Workers Benefit
72 posts in 6 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
RankPostsTeam
Club Owner6881No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200321 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2021Aug 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: totalloiner "i don't think they were but thatcher wanted revenge on the miners for the threat of strike action in 1981, and after she took us into conflict in 1982 to win a general election in 1983 she had her chance to crush them, if the deputy's hadn't have gone back to work and got paid weather they did or not she'd have lost that battle aswell. i lived through the miner's strike 84-85 my dad was a miner, there are things the government of the day did to bribe the lad's back to work that never came to fruition i'm just glad my dad had enough pride not to be bribed and stay put. but it's a long time ago. but i'd never vote tory'"


I hope this doesn't descend into chaos but here's my twopennorth.

Looking back, I remember the miners strike, and the aforementioned conflict. And whilst my father wasn't a miner, he was a soldier, as was my Uncle, and both served in the Falklands. My other Uncle was a postie and was a member of the Grimey band, and continues to blow with miners bands all over.

The idea of Thatcher using the conflict to win an election (and I certainly don't come across this as a universal truth and or opinion) is a line I do hear from miners and ex miners on a regular basis. I don't hear it from the soldiers who went to the South Atlantic, which seems at odds with this line of thinking. What makes it even more crass is that a lot of miners did very well from the redundancy packages they recieved, some of them from several pits, and have since done quite well from VWF, tinitus, emphesema etc whilst the rest of the population has had to just get on with the ailments caused by their trades.

And yet the miners still hold themselves up as objects of pity. And I get it almost every time I go down the club to sit with a bunch of men who haven't worked a day since they left the pits because they haven't needed to.

Oddly enough at the time of the Argentine invasion the RN was in the process of being disbanded, piffle you may say, but it was. The need for a Navy was massively low on priority in Monetarist circles. The 1982 conflict enabled various chiefs of the defence staff to secure funding to continue with the development of the Navy and various programmes, Rapier, Harrier, MLRS, which proved vital 9 years later.

The monetarist line was I admit, harsh and cold, and Thatchers battles with the Unions are often thrown up as examples of her brutish and calculating approach.

I do however find it a little frustrating that the actions of one government (that in reality halted the counterproductive effects of the unions,see France at the moment) have permanently affected your ability to make balanced,reasoned and evidenced voting decisions on your own. How can anyone say "I shall never vote X". What if the policy if your chosen party was so at odds with market common sense and the opposition policies sat much more in line with what was best for the country in the longer run? Would you just not vote?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach3224
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2018May 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



No doubt she chose her moment well, coal stocks were at their highest levels ever at the power stations, but I don't really want to get into a "Thatcher is the root of all evil debate"

But if memory serves me right, there was no strike ballot, and I think you'll find that it was the arrogance of Scargill who railroaded the mining industry into the ultimately disastrous strike, which decimated the industry.

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member10757No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200222 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2012Oct 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I grew up in a midlands mining town My dad wasn't a miner but my grandad was, as was our neighbour. The perception amongst many at the time of the strike was that Arthur was arrogant (as per Billy's point on the ballot) and also that this rubbed salt into the feeling that when local pits had been threatened and closed under a labour government he hadn't supported a call for industrial action - in other words that he was just as political as Thatcher was.

I don't think there is any question that Thatcher welcomed an opportunity for confrontation with the miners and had prepared well for it - remembering her predecessors disasters of 1973.

As regards the Falklands I don't believe the conflict was sought but she certainly seized the opportunity to turn into into a jingoistic festival. Without that she would very likely have lost the next election.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2023Jun 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: JohnG "Do you know the company I work for?? Have you seen any of its financial figures??

Our parent company has just paid off several hundred million pounds worth of debt and also raised hundred of millions by selling some shares it had in another company.

My company has paid £300million in cash back to the parent company and we have an order book somwhere in the region of several hundred million and prior to any announcement on redundancies had a forecast profit in excess of £100million.

Does that sound like a company in trouble?

Now perhaps you can stop putting words in my mouth and stop your petty insults.'"


A profit of £100m - some things to consider:

1. How much capital you have employed to generate that profit

2. It also depends how much of that profit is operating profit

3. What does the cashflow position of the company look like - as the saying goes profit is sanity but cash is king

4. What are the long term order books looking like - it could be they don't look so hot so it makes prudent sense to downsize now in order that supply of labour matches matches demand for product two years down the line - that is the job of management - strategy!!!

Maybe you could answer these questions rather than getting on your high horse - then we can have an informed debate or you could just name the company we can get a set of accounts from companies house and continue the debate based on fact rather than annecdotal notions

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach1125
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2017Aug 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Serge A. Storms "A profit of £100m - some things to considerThat is operating profit
3. What does the cashflow position of the company look like - as the saying goes profit is sanity but cash is king Good - they wouldn't have sent £300m to the parent co. if it wasn't
4. What are the long term order books looking like - it could be they don't look so hot so it makes prudent sense to downsize now in order that supply of labour matches matches demand for product two years down the line - that is the job of management - strategy!!! stated in my post

Maybe you could answer these questions rather than getting on your high horse - then we can have an informed debate or you could just name the company we can get a set of accounts from companies house and continue the debate based on fact rather than annecdotal notions'"


Whilst you have asked valid questions (even though one of them shows you didn't read my post fully) you still have to end up with the typical sort of dig that is typical of many on here.

Such a shame that many of you cannot have a serious debate.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman32466No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2018Aug 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: JohnG "Whilst you have asked valid questions (even though one of them shows you didn't read my post fully) you still have to end up with the typical sort of dig that is typical of many on here.

Such a shame that many of you cannot have a serious debate.'"



So if it offends then ignore the last sentence and answer the serious questions, you can't have a serious debate if you are not prepared to contribute.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach1125
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2017Aug 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: McLaren_Field "So if it offends then ignore the last sentence and answer the serious questions.'"


I have answered the serious questions

Quote: McLaren_Field "you can't have a serious debate if you are not prepared to contribute.'"


Unlike some on here, I can't answer posts at whatever time of day they come in at and I cannot see how you can imply that I haven't contributed.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman32466No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2018Aug 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: JohnG "I have answered the serious questions



Unlike some on here, I can't answer posts at whatever time of day they come in at and I cannot see how you can imply that I haven't contributed.'"


Well if you just look a couple of posts above this one you'll see one that asked some questions for you to answer, you preferred to complain about a dig at the end rather than answer the questions.

I appreciate you may not be able to but they do provide some insight into the issues that you raised on the previous page, why ignore them ?

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach1125
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2017Aug 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: McLaren_Field "Well if you just look a couple of posts above this one you'll see one that asked some questions for you to answer, you preferred to complain about a dig at the end rather than answer the questions.

I appreciate you may not be able to but they do provide some insight into the issues that you raised on the previous page, why ignore them ?'"


If you read my response again you will see that I have put my answers in bold in the quoted post from Serge A. Storms.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman32466No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2018Aug 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: JohnG "If you read my response again you will see that I have put my answers in bold in the quoted post from Serge A. Storms.'"




Move along please, nothing to see here... icon_surprised.gifops:

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member10757No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200222 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2012Oct 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: McLaren_Field "Move along please, nothing to see here...
Ha!

Take that capitalist oppressor!

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2023Jun 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: JohnG "Whilst you have asked valid questions (even though one of them shows you didn't read my post fully) you still have to end up with the typical sort of dig that is typical of many on here.

Such a shame that many of you cannot have a serious debate.'"


OK name the company and we will be able to get a set of stat accounts from companies house and we can verify that what you say is correct and have a serious debate.

£300m cash contribution to the parent? was that just a repayment of funds lent to the company by the parent in the first place?

So many imponderables - just name the firm what's the big secret?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4482No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200618 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2015Feb 2010LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: JohnG "
Does that sound like a company in trouble?
'"


They are making a sixth of the workforce redundant so yes.

Quote: JohnG "
Why would a financially stable company axe over a sixth of its workforce if it wasn't for fiscal reasons?'"


He evidently can't answer this. icon_lol.gif

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman93No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2020Jun 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I live down south nowadays, so forgive me if I've got my wires crossed...

But I was told that 'one' of the reasons the refuse guys were being asked to take a paycut was due to the council's oversight in not reacting to the 'equal pay' issue that raised it's head (via europe?) 3 years or so?
The council are now under pressure to be seen to pay equal wages to men/women, so rather than raise the wages of the female staff, they have opted to bring the men' wages down to the ladies level - and in turn, save a load of cash.

Like I say, I don't know if this is true or not - but either way I think the whole thing reflects really badly on the council - unless of course all the council bigwigs are also taking a 20/30% cut....

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2023Jun 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: MonkeyMonkey "I live down south nowadays, so forgive me if I've got my wires crossed...

But I was told that 'one' of the reasons the refuse guys were being asked to take a paycut was due to the council's oversight in not reacting to the 'equal pay' issue that raised it's head (via europe?) 3 years or so?
The council are now under pressure to be seen to pay equal wages to men/women, so rather than raise the wages of the female staff, they have opted to bring the men' wages down to the ladies level - and in turn, save a load of cash.

Like I say, I don't know if this is true or not - but either way I think the whole thing reflects really badly on the council - unless of course all the council bigwigs are also taking a 20/30% cut....'"


If they raised the wages of the females it would require a hike in the council tax of approx 18% - a non runner.

And law suggests the ladies in the office should earn what the bin men earn - not sure if that is correct but that is how I read it

72 posts in 6 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
72 posts in 6 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


8.66259765625:10
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
2m
How many games will we win
PopTart
46
5m
Film game
karetaker
5755
6m
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
9m
Transfer Talk V5
FGB
509
28m
2025 Recruitment
Bullseye
207
60m
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
Recent
Salford
karetaker
54
Recent
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
Recent
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Mark_P1973
8
Recent
Salford placed in special measures
poplar cats
111
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
58s
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63266
58s
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
1m
Salford
karetaker
54
1m
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
1m
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
1m
Salford placed in special measures
poplar cats
111
2m
IMG Score
Bull Mania
83
9m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40800
9m
Planning for next season
Bent&Bon
184
11m
New Kit
matt_wire
69
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
TODAY
2025 Squad
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Mark_P1973
8
TODAY
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
TODAY
Spirit of the Rhinos
batleyrhino
5
TODAY
Mike Ogunwole
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Bailey Dawson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
2024
REDWHITEANDB
14
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
PopTart
46
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Catalan Away
Dannyboywt1
6
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
karetaker
54
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
POSTSONLINEREGISTRATIONSRECORD
19.65M 1,710 80,15614,103
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
RLFANS Match Centre
 Thu 13th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Wigan
v
Leigh
 Fri 14th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Hull KR
v
Castleford
20:00
Catalans
v
Hull FC
 Sat 15th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Leeds
v
Wakefield
17:30
St.Helens
v
Salford
 Sun 16th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Huddersfield
v
Warrington
 Thu 20th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Wakefield
v
Hull KR
 Fri 21st Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Warrington
v
Catalans
20:00
Hull FC
v
Wigan
 Sat 22nd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
15:00
Salford
v
Leeds
20:00
Castleford
v
St.Helens
 Sun 23rd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
14:30
Leigh
v
Huddersfield
 Sun 2nd Mar 2025
     National Rugby League 2024-R1
04:30
Penrith
v
Cronulla
06:30
Canberra
v
NZ Warriors
 Thu 6th Mar 2025
     National Rugby League 2024-R1
09:00
Sydney
v
Brisbane
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
20:00
Hull FC
v
Leigh
 Fri 7th Mar 2025
     National Rugby League 2024-R1
07:00
Wests
v
Newcastle
09:00
Dolphins
v
Souths
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
20:00
Castleford
v
Salford
20:00
St.Helens
v
Hull KR
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds-Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield-Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Hull KR
Sat 8th Mar
SL
17:30
Catalans-Leeds
Sun 9th Mar
SL
17:30
Warrington-Wakefield
SL
17:30
Wigan-Huddersfield
Thu 20th Mar
SL
20:00
Salford-Huddersfield
Fri 21st Mar
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Warrington
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
2m
How many games will we win
PopTart
46
5m
Film game
karetaker
5755
6m
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
9m
Transfer Talk V5
FGB
509
28m
2025 Recruitment
Bullseye
207
60m
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
Recent
Salford
karetaker
54
Recent
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
Recent
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Mark_P1973
8
Recent
Salford placed in special measures
poplar cats
111
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
58s
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63266
58s
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
1m
Salford
karetaker
54
1m
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
1m
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
1m
Salford placed in special measures
poplar cats
111
2m
IMG Score
Bull Mania
83
9m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40800
9m
Planning for next season
Bent&Bon
184
11m
New Kit
matt_wire
69
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
TODAY
2025 Squad
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Mark_P1973
8
TODAY
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
TODAY
Spirit of the Rhinos
batleyrhino
5
TODAY
Mike Ogunwole
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Bailey Dawson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
2024
REDWHITEANDB
14
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
PopTart
46
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Catalan Away
Dannyboywt1
6
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
karetaker
54
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!