he's 16 stone and an has never been described as a heap of "Muscle"
Ive seen him in Mcdonalds....

Fair points. In the case of Ferres and others I think they should serve a minimum ban of x games which is then extended until the injured player has played twice. So for Ferres he misses 6 minimum, if gildart does not play again this season, neither does Ferres. That would make players think twice. In the case of say flower he would have had to appeal what would be in effect a life ban. Sounds harsh but would help cut this stuff out IMO.

Why would he? Hohaia played again for Saints after that incident.

I'd bring out the dunking stool.

If he sinks, he's a wizard and will drown.
If he floats, he's a wizard and will be drowned.

Haaland played again for man city, but Roy Keane clearly ended his career

I think the concept of a ban matching the injury sounds like a great idea but impossible to enforce fairly.

Everyone agrees (I think) that what the RFL lack is constancy. Simple solution in my view is make the refs use the jeffin cards! Red and going down a player for the rest of the game is worse than 2 weeks off and should be used. Both Leeds with Ferres and Wolves with Westwood gained an advantage through foul play. No amount of bans can change that in the eyes of Wigan and Leeds respectively, simple solution use the red and use the vid ref if need be to sort it.

But Flower didn't "clearly" end Hohaia's. If you'd care to read up on this type of injury you'd know that it is almost exclusively caused by multiple smaller impacts usually over a protracted period. As in the case of Hohaia, for example, who suffered many concussive injuries throughout his career.

There's a lot of research and data on this if you'd care to check it out as opposed to regurgitating something you heard in a pub.

Ferres would definitely float, not sure he's a wizard though. Re flower I had forgotten lance h played a few games after incident.

I am not saying Ferres shouldn't receive a ban for his offence.

It was not bad luck that caused Gildart really rather serious injury it was Ferres' actions. Just as it was Westwood's that caused Singelton's injury and concussion.

I was querying why under his new idea which purported to show fairness and sense, he included a tag line which was the opposite message.

In 2015 this rlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v was a red card. I remember being surprised at the time thinking it would just be yellow. But throughout 2015 the refs seemed to have a new protocol for serious shots to the head and there were a few more reds dished out for high shots in 2015. Bearing in mind here aswell, Ah Van was effecting a tackle on a man carrying the ball. Westwood was late, high and there was some level of intent. How he didnt see red Ive no idea. Yet, we get Child again when Thaler was dropped the week before. Useless!

You get Child again we get Thaler Agree with you on the high shots, Check out ben flowers red v warrington last yesr (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcoUErQ_J60) It was deserved but no where near as bad as westwoods. As mentioned before imo the best way to treat these fouls fairly is to brandish the cards correctly. If that requires the vid ref to have a word then i'm all with it.

You get Child again we get Thaler Agree with you on the high shots, Check out ben flowers red v warrington last yesr (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcoUErQ_J60) It was deserved but no where near as bad as westwoods. As mentioned before imo the best way to treat these fouls fairly is to brandish the cards correctly. If that requires the vid ref to have a word then i'm all with it.

Its amazing isn't it that earlier in the season the "in" thing was to throw the ball at a defender in or near the ruck and you got a penalty. The RFL soon sorted that but they seem to have an aversion to getting rid of deliberate foul play as demonstrated by Ferres and Westwood. They should instantly instruct (not advise) the refs to start waving red cards for these offences. Unless action is taken now someone is going to suffer a life-threatening injury. Gildart and Sutcliffe should not have been exposed to this kind of assault.

High shots like these were common in the game up until the late 1980s. Around 1989 the RFL issued an edict to referees instructing them that any contact with the head was a straight sending off. At disciplinary committees they really clamped down with an 8 match suspension being handed out very often indeed.

The effect was very positive. Thuggery decreased markedly. From that moment on if the second or third man in the tackle wrapped the ball up rather than took your head off.

Sometimes it takes a blanket approach to cut through all the confusion. Draw a line under previous interpretation. Any contact with the head and it's a red card from now on.

Whilst I agree with you Bullseye to an extent there is the grey area of how hard a player has been hit to the head.
If it is just a slap or mis timed i.e player side steps you and your hand catches his head.
Is that a straight red card when compared to what Westwood did.
The use of the VR should come in regardless.

We could send a team of 17 Robbie Burrow's out on the field & within about 20 minutes, hey presto we'd be playing against a 10 or 11 man team!