Jeez,how high up was he?

Wasn't having any of that last night was he

......

"it's the same for both sides Kev"
"It's not" and just walked off

Poor show, Sinny.

I believe if you check the RL by-laws, it states that any Captain winning three Grand Finals is promoted to the rank of 'Super-Captain' and with that rank goes the privilege of questioning any and all decision as he sees fit.

Think I heard Sinny somehwere say during his conversation. Am I not Captain, thus am I not allowed to talk to you - to which Bentham replied yes you can (so Sinny was just joining the ranks of other captains in the past ala Joynt, Sculthorpe, Farrell, Deacon etc etc)

Thought Sinfield had a good game last night.
Great kick from near touch after Bailey had left the field, to effectively make the game safe, and intelligent enough to slot over a '1 pointer' at the end.

Give over! - Dummy seems well out.

Look at the game again. Sinfield was questioning decisions in a positive manner as he is allowed to do as captain.

Rather have captains questioning decisions and giving positive feedback to his team rahter than the situ like headingley last year where Ganson wouldnt allow decisions to be questioned, the players got frustrated and Scruton spear tackled Cunningham.

I'm glad he was talking to the ref.

He did say something like "I'm captain can I not talk to you then? I thought rules were the same for both sides?" when the ref said they are he just no they're not.

Top lad

Sinfield has been utterly wreckless in encouraging the RL ref-bashing culture. I had come to expect better of him.

If the captain didn't question decisions I'd see them as very disinterested. Sinfield has every right to question decisions and rightly so. Also thoughthe had a very good game especially in defence.

Damn straight. Am I right in thinking he came up with two one-on-one ball steals?