If it was a contractual clause then yes, if not who knows. Neither coach appear to go in for public negative comments regarding individual performances from players.

If I were Worrall I'd hardly construe Mclennan's comments this week as positive or a glowing endorsement.

He implied he didn't see Worrall as a game breaker with Leeds needing one to come from behind.

Is that a "positive" from Worrall's point of view?

You raise a valid point about how far backwards Sinfield has gone under Mclennan's stewardship in terms of discipline.

Its' not just there though is it. Remember, our captain was shorlisted for Man of Steel at least twice under Smith's guidance.

Since McLenann's arrival he's looked a shadow of that player, albiet still a very important one in terms of our team.

Why would you not want to further discussion the regression Mclennan is instilling in our better players? It's an important issue.

It's probably a sincere appraisal although I've no idea if Worrall would agree or see it that way.

McClennan still wasn't commenting on an individual player's performance as he didn't once mention Worrall's ability or lack of to warm the bench.

I hope the Chief exec sits down privately with the coach and gives an honest assessment of his performance last weekend.

By accident you've prompted an interesting point.

I've just looked up 8 other players to see if their discipline has got better or worse, or, more to the point, I was looking to see how much worse.

Danny McGuire & Rob Burrow are far less likely to give away penalties this year than last year.

Ali & JJB are also improved under Mclennan (despite JJB being singled out unfairly as some sort of penalty machine this year) with JJB markedly better this year.

Lee Smith is worse this year, but last year stayed at the same level as under Tony Smith - mirroring the team.

Keith Senior and Jamie Peacock were terrible last year - far, far worse than 2007 but both have turned that round completely this year.

For the team to have changed so radically this year (from 9th worst to 2nd worst) there must be others, beyond Smith & Sinfield who have got far worse in 2009 if players like Peacock, Senior, JJB, Burrow & McGuire are actually conceding far less. Also suggests that something is being done to curb indiscipline but that some players are responding well, but others are not.

what about Ablett? he seems to have given away his fair share this year

This may be late as the discussion has moved on but

Using the stats on the SL websiteYear - Penalties conceded (No of Games) - Avg per SL Reg Rd -

2003 - 170 (28 ) - 6.07
2004 - 142 (28 ) - 5.07
2005 - 125 (28 ) - 4.46
2006 - 162 (28 ) - 5.79
2007 - 198 (27) - 7.33
2008 - 215 (27) - 7.96
2009 - 180 (22) - 8.18

The rot set in between Smith's second and third season.

While the numbers are still increasing under McClennan (that was happening anyway before he took over) the rate of increase has been declining under his tutelage.

Falls into the Smith category - worse this year.

That's a very lazy job.

We need comparisons for all players for Smith's first two years in charge and Mclennans'

Then and only then can you doubt the obvious conclusion that this team is far more ill disciplined than its' predecessors.

In fact, the only reliable statistic is where we lie in the fair play table, rather than comparing ourselves from previous seasons and I am afraid THAT statistic doesn't lie.

Under Mclennan we are the 2nd most ill disciplined team in the league. Levels Smith's teams did not stoop to.

surely it shouldnt be about the people who give away the penalties but rather the type of penalties that as team we are giving away?