This.

They don't reallt have the strong carries bit covered. That's why he'd be a good signing.

A team that is presently in the top 4 of the league table.

So back to France, where there is only one team to play for in Super League?

Not surprising really. An average journey man, makes sense to go back home.

He would still never get the chance to play for a top club. By top club of course I am meaning the top four regarded clubs.

Assuming we don't get anyone from Australia, Lulia would be a good signing - potentially Carmost-esque IMO. If Hardaker is a FB then it would be a good move to bring in a skilful and experienced centre who makes tries for his winger.

As for the forwards, I think Elima is a good player (AND better than Hauraki). On paper he'd do well but then again I'd have expected Griffin to have been a lot better all round and Moore to be a lot more aggressive, but neither happened.

Bateman looks like a work in progress and I don't think we'll see the best from him for another year or so. Burgess looks like a big lump with not much skill. Whitehead stands out more but I can't decide if he's more of a Paul Medley or an Andy Hay...

Michael Platt and, if the Bulls get him back from his loan at Wakefield, Paul Sykes.

and before you all think I've gone mad or Gotcha agrees........

regarded by whom?

Fact is, next year he'll be playing for a club that is presently in the top 4.

Craig Huby on the other hand.................

You couldn't have picked worse examples there than to try and tie me in to it. I have had arguments before on here, with the likes of Ritchie about how poor a players both of them are, especially Platt.



Tough luck with that one.

Lulia looks the pick of the bunch. Would be a useful signing that.

We really don't want their accountant.

Not done too well picking leaders have they? A lawyer who got them sued and an accountant who couldn't balance the books.

PMSL