Yeah, you're not trying to conflate the 2 jools.

perhaps because of shots to the head whilst playing rugby he has developed MND- hasn’t stopped you doing the same to fages though. Twice at your spot your players have employed the exact same tactics- under two different coaches. so yes I’m conflating the two because the scientific research is suggesting there’s a link.

You're trying to conflate the 2 because of your leeds agenda, was the tackle a particularly bad one, no, was it shthousery, no. Have you called out your own players on their high tackles this year? Is Pryce a shthouse too.

When the giants have had players banned this year has it been because of your coaches dirty tactics to take players out?

If you are going to use Rob's tragic plight to support another of your increasingly infantile outbursts, at least take the time to spell his name correctly.

People like jools are the worst, taking an emotive and serious situation to peg his own agenda on to, aiming to come across as morally right but doing the opposite.

Like racists who only point out crimes committed by people of a certain colour.

This is pathetic.

There’s a small section of Huddersfield fans who seem to have developed a massive chip on their shoulders.

One of your players was given a big ban for a similar tackle that broke a players neck and ended his career, is this proof of your sides tactics?

don’t go throwing stones.

This is a parody post, right?

Combine the default inferiority complex of seemingly all Huddersfield fans with their toxic dislike for players who leave for greener pastures and you end up with posts like this.

Grow up jowls.

Broke a players neck and ended his career? Are you making stuff up now? Which of our players did this exactly.
I’m just responding to you lot starting a thread whining about cheats. And pointing out there’s a massive difference between trying to slow a game down and trying to injure someone. What’s pathetic is you failing to recognise the difference.
There’s a massive section of Leeds fans who are just plain arrogant.

Apologies it was badly worded, a similar tack to one that ended a players career.

What’s pathetic is bringing Rob Burrow into this. And that’s me being kind.

Was the tackle because fages was deliberately being targeted- yes, was that a tactic of the game - yes. Was that the same last time yes- clearly because three players were banned after the game all for tackles on the same player- not a coincidence!
Have I called players out for high tackles- if I feel they are done deliberately then yes I would certainly do that. Given our record I can’t say there’s a pattern- unlike Leeds- who are top of the pops in bans.
Is pryce a house? The jury is still out as I’ve yet to see enough of him he’s played just 12 games this season but IMO He’s an extremely overhyped player who can’t tackle, has poor technique and needs to sort out his petulant attitude.

Theo Fages??
Come on Jools - he's hardly Wally Lewis.
Can't see us deliberately targeting him.
And if we did, would we really pick Sezer to do it?
This really is a ridiculous discussion.

Tackle was slightly late. Head clash. One game ban. We'll take it.
Let's just move on.

Cool story, shame it's make believe.
Assuming it's the April game you're on about, Tetevano was our only player that was banned.

Sezer acted as any edge defender would when caught out. He shot in and got it ever so slightly wrong. Happens all the time. The ban is a bit harsh but in line with what we’ve seen this year. I’m sure Sezer will cop more of those than he gives out.

To bring Rob into this is not only below the belt it’s ludicrous.