Leeds will play a full strength team for the remaining 2 games no doubt about it.

I think they probably will.....don't think it's the right idea though.

If JJB is going round again then he should be feet up for the next 2 weeks. probably Watkins and Hall too as they will likely figure until back end of november for England. I would probably look at keeping McGuire in cotton wool and give a couple of the props like Galloway and Cuthbertson an extended rest. The rest probably play.

I would guess we will go out to win with the best side available. There certainly is a case for resting JJB and Watkins because of their high workload but with the latter having taken so long to find his best form may he well want to enjoy it for a bit longer. I would be disappointed if the fit players didn't want to keep winning for the fans sake.

You still talking poop Smokey? All 8 qualifiers monies for next season are decided by their position...it's not prize money. I am sure you will have a comeback (usually contradicting what you originally said but purporting to be the same)

This is the right sentiment.

We shouldn't make wholesale changes but where players ate carrying injuries or need a rest we can now do this.

It's also an opportunity for fringe players to get game time and experience.

For me its a no brainer .

If they are injured (McGuire, delaney) I agree they should not and I think will not play. However, if they are just a tad tired, they should still be playing at full tilt for mine.

3 reasons. Firstly, they need confidence going into next year, playing a makeshift side and getting stuffed by hudds and Leigh will be a poor way to end a very poor season.

Secondly, they have had challenge cup rest weeks already plus for cuthbertson and others he will finish about 4 weeks earlier than last season as he played v New Zealand.

Finally, the u18's got over 50 points put through them v Salford u19's at the weekend. Filling the team with them and fringe players will not beat Huddersfield. They would get slaughtered.

So you are saying that the top 4 dont get the SL tv funding and positions 5-8 dont win money based on their finishing position? Interesting...

Just as I thought, a little twist from you. 1-4 get there share of the TV monies for 2017. 5-8 get a position related share of the TV monies for 2017. See ya ya argumentative bugger.

Im genuinely interested in what on earth you think the twist is here?

No mention of 'prize money'

Ahh the ever important distinction between money won on the basis of success and prize money.

Great contribution there...