I didn't see it like that.

I thought Hansen saw the opportunity to "do" the Warrington player and he took the opportunity to do it as hard as he could.

I think the completion of the tackle was of little interest to Hansen. He went into the collision with the intent to hurt the player. And given he was pretty much going straight into the back of someone not expecting it IMO there was a serious danger of major injury.

Hansen's tackle may have been legal. The Wire incidents definitely were not legal. But IMO Hansen's was a great deal more of a *wrong* challenge than the Warrington players challenges.

I don't really have any sympathy for Warrington over it. Westwood's hit really was a c**** hit and the later one was a bad one too. But they were the kind of nonsense that often happens during tackles and most of the time doesn't get seen. Hansen's challenge was many times worse for me and no amount of "it was legal" comments is going to alter that.

Westwood will go to Red Hall about his smack on Green, there's no doubt about that but if he picks up a ban, it'll just get served out in the pre-season friendlies - so what's the point?

It shows that have a team full of old players has some issues - Wigan looked to have much more energy towards the end of the first half and early in the second. McDermott take note

A good young one beats a good old one every day of the week. Always being that way.

Agree - that will an issue for Leeds for the next two seasons at least - the squad has far to many sacred cows who are well the wrong side of 30. I fail to see how the club can prevent the likes of Peacock/Sinfield/Burrow/JJB still playing when they are 37/38 - that will be a massive issue. Loyalty is one thing but it cannot rule your decision-making.

Bizarre comment. Ryan Bailey Danny Maguire say no more

Yep worked that way in 2012 with Leeds vs Wigan

MacQuarie is innocent!

Has JJB been in prison???

Do you understand the saying?