Quote rhinoms="rhinoms"Damo i've not fallen for any injury argument just pointing out differences you left out of the comparison you made and they still add up to the same thing = Aussies too good end of!
As for working both ways Morley and Peacock are finished at this level mate and i don't think Sinfield at 9 would of done any better than Roby so what many would consider major losses for England would not of had enough of an impact to change the same end result.'"
You mentioned that '[ithis Aussie side is missing Thurston ,Inglis ,Hayne ,Folau ,Hodges and still beat us in 2nd gear![/i' of which I interpreted as that England would of done a lot worse if such players were playing in this mornings four nations battle.
If I interpreted wrong then please forgive me.
Yes both add up to the same thing but whilst Australia have declined in attack, England have gained in Defence. England have likewise declined in attack, but gain in defence.
So yes your pretty much spot on that it’s the same result whatever in an Australian win. However you cannot deny the improvement in defence by England, but most worrying of all is the decline in attack when we wasn’t that much of an attacking threat before anyways.
Sinfield performed sensationally in last years four nations and your right he wouldn’t of made much diffrence. But the truth is, it was Sinfields efforts that saw us at least get to the finals.
Can’t really argue with your Morley and Peacock opinion.
My conclusion is that this England side has declined this year and it’d be interesting to see the stats. It wasn’t that long ago we drew in two friendly’s that we should of walked with ease.