Your right they wouldnt have . does this then make them less or more despicable than the present shower ? I personally wouldnt vote Tory while I have a hole , but then neither shall I vote for what used to be the Labour party .

You won’t find me doing that on the dole again. No way am I getting back into Slaveployment..

I’ve been introduced to graft before thank you.

You're a bit screwed then (unless you intend to waste your vote or not participate at all) as one or the other will still gain the most seats at the upcoming general election and seek to form the next government.

So which of the two represent the lesser evil?

As the lines between both main parties are now so blurred will it even matter who I vote for ? probably not ,

At least when I first voted Good and Evil were clearly defined .

he's clearly targeted an easy voting community,imo cameron's publicity staff have f**ked up big time here though with his so called good wishes towards the club.
if they had photo-shopped his face onto a rhinos player whilst wearing the shirt in the first place,then he could have counted on 75% of the vote alone in the next elections from the southstand residents

I despise Brown, purely for the reason he took power, wasnt elected and has then done nothing good with it at all. He was handed the keys to the kingdom and chose to do nothing of significance. When your lasting legacy will be massive debt then your whole tenure has been completely pointless.

That said Cameron is hardly going to be the most useful of prime ministers, another power hungry waster who will achieve nothing of note and spend their time in charge occupying themselves with small changes to relatively inconsequential issues than doing doing something of merit.

Neither of them are a lesser evil, they are both arsing around making mountains out of molehills to distract us from the real issues. Besides voting for Idi Amin because he isnt quite as bad as Hitler is no real excuse

You sir are a fool! Brown was elected.

gordon brown succeeded tony blair in june 2007 as labour party leader but he was never "elected"

You sir are also a tool!!

Brown was elected.

It still surprises me, although it shouldn't, that some of the electorate believe that you actually do elect a Prime Minister.

Its what the sun paper tells us though isn’t It?

It surprises me the a large part of the electorate fell for some not particularly clever word play to justify what happened.

brown was never elect by the populace, 2 small towns in scotland are the only places to ever vote for Gordon Brown to represent them

a Brown led party was never elected by the populace of the country he governs. Which is my point, he never had to pander to our ridiculous media to get himself elected, he never had to do the dance with the devil and compromise. He has nothing to lose, he could be revolutionary, he can be controversial, he can ignore petty party politics because he never got elected and never will. He could have done some real good but he chose not to. He chose to make minor changes to fiscal policy and erode some liberties we have had for hundreds of years.

My problem with him isnt what he has done, but what he hasnt. We have massive social problems in this country that arent even being addressed at all because people are being distracted by inconsequential arguments over what kind of scarf an Asian lady has on her head.

Gordon Brown wont be remebered as a bad Prime-minister, he wont be remembered at all