Quote: G1 "You don't think the club should be accountable for the fans invading the pitch and attacking the players? Next thing you'll be defending the homophobia in Cas.'" Nobody "attacked" any player, niether did "fans" ie more than one invade the pitch, if you were there you would know that. A drunken idiot came on the pitch in tee shirt and shorts, took off his tee shirt, attempted to to snort the try line and was then grabbed by two stewards and frogmarched out of the KC. He never laid a finger on any player. www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/?p=6732

Quote: G1 "You don't think the club should be accountable for the fans invading the pitch and attacking the players? Next thing you'll be defending the homophobia in Cas.'" Nobody "attacked" any player, niether did "fans" ie more than one invade the pitch, if you were there you would know that. A drunken idiot came on the pitch in tee shirt and shorts, took off his tee shirt, attempted to to snort the try line and was then grabbed by two stewards and frogmarched out of the KC. He never laid a finger on any player. www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/?p=6732

It was a general response directed at a knee-jerking and [idrama queen[/i account of proceedings which bears little resemblance to reality.

I saw one fella in the first half invade the pitch, mimic scoring a try and then doing an impression of Robbie Fowler. He was dealt with by the stewards and summarily ejected from the stadium. I didn't see the alleged attack on Donald... but given some of the dramatic outpourings of what actually took place, I assume Donald is hospitalised after being allegedly subjected to GBH? Or is that just more knee-jerkery?

As for the atmosphere at the game - baying opposition fans and players? LOL! Compared to the old days at the Boulevard, yesterday's atmosphere resembled a picnic at the Chelsea Flower Show!

And as for the Bailey incident, he elbowed Radford several times with intent and the dumb meathead reacted with punches and got sent off. Job well done I'd say. Bailey doing what he does best - winding up an opposition player - getting a penalty, or even better - being instrumental in getting someone sent off.

Now please excuse me while I laughingly consider the ted opinion of a drama queen that Radford's meatheaded reaction to Bailey's provocation was far worse an act of aggression than what Bailey did time for at Her Majesty's Pleasure.

I'll dismiss your homophobic reference as a ted introduction of the red herring variety which is worthy of no further response.

That well documented that most of our fans didn't even know there was a second incident and the one person that did see a fan run on from South Stand said they didn't even touch Donald, do keep up

Really? Interesting. I didn't hear any homophobic chants yesterday.

We all saw the idiot run on from chav corner and what happened there. A minute of a drunk 15 to 19 year chav running around, and then getting removed from the stadium. We've all got them.

Nothing will happen to Hull there.

Does anybody actually know the facts of this supposed second incident? Or are people just speculating?

You get me wrong, no where in my posts do I condone any fan going on the pitch, anyone who goes on the pitch at any ground in the land should get a life time ban end of.

At the moment, the RFL arn't even investigating it! It was an utterly nothing incident.



I'm more worried about the snipers personally.

She's a Hull fan ....it's what they do best.

Although to be fair they leave the goalposts up these days

I wouldn't worry Hull White Star.

See the generalistic comment at the end of the post, he / she have their prejudices in place. Shame people are still like that in todays day and age.

What wound the RFL up most over that incident?

I think you'll find it was Castlefords inadequate response, hence Hull FC being quick out of the blocks today, not that I expect anything to come of their investigation, Chav corner has had them stumped for 7 years.