Fair points what I was trying to say is that if you have Burrow and McGuire on the field at the same time then Sinfield has to defend 4 in otherwise you have two half back defending together against a centre and a second row. In years previous Leeds had other attacking options are weren't so reliant on all the plays going through Sinfield. These days everything goes through him so if you tire him he is far less effective. IMO he has been more targeted in the last two years than previously.

For me, whatever the combinations, the starting team needs to have, Hardaker, Briscoe, Watkins, Moon, Hall, Sinfield, Peacock, Cuthbertson, Ablett, and Stevie Ward in it. Others need to fit around that, then we see how it goes.

Thought Ward showed the benefits of a full off-season of gym work on Boxing Day. Seems to have put on plenty of bulk, without losing any mobility in the process.

Bigger tests await, but he's got everything in place to kick on.

I still think he has more talent than being just a crash ball merchant lets hope our Coach finally utilises this.

You can only play with so many pivots in your team though. Leeds currently have three, arguably four when Sutcliffe, McGuire, Burrow and Sinfield are on the field at the same time.

There's simply not scope to fit Ward into the team as anything other than a runner at this point in time. Unfortunate for him, but it's purely an accident of birth that he's come along at the time he has done.

If it takes Sinfield to play hooker to get him back tackling down the middle, rather than on the fringes, I'd take that.

The problem is that I get the feeling that Sinfield was taken out of the middle because he couldn't do it for 80 mins. I would think it unlikely that he would move back there for more than the odd game

I'm hoping that his first off season for a while will see Sinfield rejuvenated the way it did for Peacock.

For reasons that should be obvious to anyone, Sinfield needs to be in the team.However, pairing him with McGuire gives us a very ponderous half back pairing. I'd prefer to see Burrow at 7 but Sutcliffe also needs game time.

It's a conundrum but luckily we have the right coach to solve it.......

Oh, and I remain to be convinced that Ward should get his place in the 17 back, let alone be a first choice, even if his new meaty thighs have got a few posters juices flowing.

I think our best bet in the halves is probably Sinfield at 7 and Sutcliffe at 6. Gives Sutty the opportunity to really make his mark at pivot (clearly his best position) while having Kev alongside him to direct. McGuire is excellent cover, and Burrow can come off the bench.

1. Hardaker
2. Briscoe
3. Watkins
4. Moon
5. Hall
6. Sutcliffe
7. Sinfield (C)
8. Cuthbertson
9. Aiton
10. Peacock
11. Achurch
12. Ablett
13. Delaney

14. Burrow
15. Leuluai
16. Singleton/Yates
17. Jones-Buchanan

Agree with G1 regarding Ward. And agree with the poster above who's name I have somehow forgot in the time its taken me to click 'reply' regarding Sutcliffe.

That is all.

While I know there's a significant difference in terms of intensity and opposition between the opposition in the last two games and what can be expected in the SL regular rounds, there has appeared to be more pace and urgency around the team with McGuire and Sutcliffe running things.

It's to be hoped that urgency doesn't disappear when the reins go back to the captain.

I would agree with that, but I also think that is also down to another couple of changes. The ability of having a big forward who can hit the line and move a pass on, very much like in the James Graham mould, and an actual attacking running backrower in Stevie Ward.

As you said, the opposition needs to be taken into account, but regardless of that these are two things which were missing previously against whatever opposition. This has given much more options to the half back pairing.