Poppycock.

The leeds team of 15 would outmuscle the bulls team of 03, and be able to match 06 saints on class and beat them with heart.

Both those teams had [ip$ss easy[/i formats to win the treble in. Super 8's is ridiculously hard.

I’m not saying that Aus/NZ players are necessarily better than English ones; I’m saying that being able to sign good Aus/NZ players whilst being able to retain your great English players as well makes for a better team than only being able to sign average Aus/NZ players and retain good English players. That’s the difference between SL in the early –mid 00’s and now IMO.

You surely can’t be claiming there’s anyone in super league right now as good as an in form
Off the top of my head I reckon all of: Sam Burgess, Sam Tomkins, James Graham, Joel Tomkins, Gareth Ellis, Owen Farrell, Kyle Eastmond and Chris Ashton would have won trophies with SL teams had they stayed.

I'm not sure I agree. In 2005 you made the semis, in 2007 you won the league. Despite the play offs, in the actual league you were only 2 points from finishing second in 2006. I don't see what would suddenly have made you terrible in 2006. It wasn't that you were terrible, we were just so far ahead that year.



Saints won the World Club Challenge in 2007 too if that's what you're referring to. Obviously I'm just as biased as all of you are But for me, Saints were the most impressive. To only lose 4 games all year, by a collective margin of 10 points, is a degree of dominance that is unparalleled. For comparison, before the Super 8s even started, this year you had lost 6 and drawn 1, including a 15 point loss to Wigan, a 14 point loss to Widnes, and 19 point loss to Warrington.

No, I'm referring to the double of World Club and Super League in the same season. People said it couldn't be done, as you had to peak at the start and the end of the season.

True for other teams. Not for us!

I've pointed out previously those "flaws" in our 2004 season. Saints 2004 campaign was similar to our 2006 campaign. Wigan were on the slide that saw them miss the playoffs e next two years and Bradford whilst our closest challengers had hit their peak in 2003 (they'd only succeed again in 2005 due to a few certain circumstances......Senior's injury, Newton injuring Saints players, Salary Cap breaches).

Just to add, part of leeds treble actually included retaining a trophy won the previous season, which is something the bulls 03 team can't lay claim to. I guess you could say the saints 06 team did this, if you want to count retaining LLS, which is part of the treble.

Saints losing only a few games all season looks good but it also pointed to a weak league. Even leeds were able to coast thorough games and win by 40. It's probably around then that AP had his flat track bully league table.

With maybe the exception of wakey there were no gimme games this season

Peacock was Man of Steel in 2003. I don't think this period of his career should be underestimated or swept aside due to his later exploits at Leeds.

He became a different kind of player at Leeds (less of an individual line-breaker and more of a pack-leader and metre-maker). Difficult to compare the two eras but many felt after his first season at Headingley that it wasn't quite working out (2006). You may recall the big debates on here about whether or not he should have played prop forward. Thankfully he did make the transition by 2007.

Agree with this and what Flex has been saying. Saints had no real credible opposition in 2006. All the other big clubs were in the doldrums that year. The very fact that they played Hull (remember that great all-conquering B&W side, yeah right!) in the final speaks volumes. 2003 and 2015 were far more competitive.

Leeds were below average from the aftermath of the 2005 Challenge Cup Final until the latter half of the 2007 season when they turned it around after Tony Smith announced he was leaving.